ArticleSeminars in plastic surgery2004
Patient education and decision making in breast reconstruction.
Article in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- ASO Author Reflections: How TikTok Views Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Is This the Right Link? How TikTok Views Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Breast reconstruction following mastectomy in Indian women: a neglected entity.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions.American journal of health behavior · 2021Article
- Patient-Guided Breast Reconstruction Education.Cureus · 2020Article
- Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: emotional impact and guidelines for psychological support.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A well-informed patient who actively participates in decision making is an essential ingredient of successful outcome in breast reconstruction. The plastic surgeon must be prepared to answer all the patient's questions in a clear and concise manner. All women considering breast reconstruction need to understand the rationale for reconstruction and have realistic expectations for what can be accomplished. They need to consider the optimal timing and the advantages and disadvantages of each technical option. The patient education process can be enhanced by the thoughtful inclusion of growing set of educational tools and decision aids. This article reviews each of these issues and suggests a way to organize and present the essential material in a way that has proven effective with women in our practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.