SynthesisThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2010
Complementary and alternative medicine for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of patient characteristics, placebo-response rates, and treatment outcomes relative to standard antidepressants.
Synthesis in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01635218 (Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Treatment for Moderate to Severe Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Treatment for Moderate to Severe Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women: a Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Study Protocol
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to treat mental disorders during pregnancy: A systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Predictors of placebo response in pharmacological and dietary supplement treatment trials in pediatric autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2015Pooled it
- Program ACTIVE II: Outcomes From a Randomized, Multistate Community-Based Depression Treatment for Rural and Urban Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2019Trial
- Trial
- A double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid for depression.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2015Trial
- A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) versus escitalopram in major depressive disorder.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Anti-Inflammatory Treatment Efficacy in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Review
- Returning to basic principles to develop more effective treatments for central nervous system disorders.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Effect of Korean Red Ginseng in individuals exposed to high stress levels: a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Journal of ginseng research · 2019Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine contacts by persons with mental disorders in 25 countries: results from the World Mental Health Surveys.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2018Article
- Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017Review
- Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) of the BraveNet practice-based research network: study protocol.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2016Observational
- Nutrition, psychoneuroimmunology and depression: the therapeutic implications of omega-3 fatty acids in interferon-α-induced depression.BioMedicine · 2015Article
- Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Prevention of Mood and Anxiety Disorders.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015Article
- Omega-3 fatty acid and nutrient deficits in adverse neurodevelopment and childhood behaviors.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2014Review
- Building an evidence base in complementary and integrative healthcare for child and adolescent psychiatry.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2013Review
- Mood disorders and complementary and alternative medicine: a literature review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare patient characteristics, placebo-response rates, and outcome differences in active treatment compared to placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and standard antidepressants for major depressive disorder (MDD). DATA SOURCES: Eligible studies were first identified using searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, restricted to English, by cross-referencing the search term placebo with each of the antidepressants (those that had received letters of approval by the US, Canadian, or EU drug regulatory agencies for the treatment of MDD) and selected CAM agents. These searches were limited to articles published between January 1, 1980, and September 15, 2009 (inclusive). Reference lists from identified studies were also searched for studies eligible for inclusion. STUDY SELECTION: We selected RCTs for MDD that included validated diagnostic assessment and baseline/outcome measures of illness severity. Assessment was limited to widely used CAM agents most frequently studied in RCTs with pill placebo: St John's wort, omega-3 fatty acids, and S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe). DATA SYNTHESIS: Of eligible publications, 173 reported results of 1 trial, and 5 included > 1 trial, representing a total of 185 RCTs. Patient variables, including illness severity, were similar across CAM and antidepressant RCTs, except for a higher proportion of women in CAM studies (P = .0003). Random-effects meta-analysis indicated that both antidepressant and CAM monotherapy resulted in superior response rates compared with placebo. Placebo-response rates were significantly lower for patients enrolled in CAM versus antidepressant RCTs (P = .002). Meta-regression analyses yielded no significant differences in the relative risk of prematurely discontinuing therapy due to any reason between active treatment and placebo for antidepressant and CAM RCTs, although discontinuation due to adverse events was higher in antidepressant RCTs compared to CAM RCTs (P = .007).
conclusionsParticipants in CAM trials were more likely to be female and to have a lower placebo-response rate compared to those in standard antidepressant trials for MDD. Trials of standard antidepressants and CAM therapies were composed of patients with similar depression severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20573327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.