Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20573239›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2010

Molecular evolution of genes in avian genomes.

Kiwoong Nam, Carina Mugal, Benoit Nabholz, Holger Schielzeth, Jochen B W Wolf, Niclas Backström, Axel Künstner, Christopher N Balakrishnan, Andreas Heger, Chris P Ponting and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hybrid de novo genome assembly of the sexually dimorphic Lady Amherst's pheasant.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kiwoong NamDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala, S-752 36, Sweden.
Carina Mugal
Benoit Nabholz
Holger Schielzeth
Jochen B W Wolf
Niclas Backström
Axel Künstner
Christopher N Balakrishnan
Andreas Heger
Chris P Ponting
David F Clayton
Hans Ellegren
Uppsala University · SEUniversity of Oxford · GBGoodwin College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Songbird Neurogenomics InitiativeR01NS045264 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CLAYTON, DAVID F · 2003 to 2010
$2.6M
Medical Research Council MC_U137761446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObtaining a draft genome sequence of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), the second bird genome to be sequenced, provides the necessary resource for whole-genome comparative analysis of gene sequence evolution in a non-mammalian vertebrate lineage. To analyze basic molecular evolutionary processes during avian evolution, and to contrast these with the situation in mammals, we aligned the protein-coding sequences of 8,384 1:1 orthologs of chicken, zebra finch, a lizard and three mammalian species.

resultsWe found clear differences in the substitution rate at fourfold degenerate sites, being lowest in the ancestral bird lineage, intermediate in the chicken lineage and highest in the zebra finch lineage, possibly reflecting differences in generation time. We identified positively selected and/or rapidly evolving genes in avian lineages and found an over-representation of several functional classes, including anion transporter activity, calcium ion binding, cell adhesion and microtubule cytoskeleton.

conclusionsFocusing specifically on genes of neurological interest and genes differentially expressed in the unique vocal control nuclei of the songbird brain, we find a number of positively selected genes, including synaptic receptors. We found no evidence that selection for beneficial alleles is more efficient in regions of high recombination; in fact, there was a weak yet significant negative correlation between omega and recombination rate, which is in the direction predicted by the Hill-Robertson effect if slightly deleterious mutations contribute to protein evolution. These findings set the stage for studies of functional genetics of avian genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBase CompositionChickensChromosomesFinchesGenomeNervous SystemOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticSequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID20573239
PMCPMC2911116
OpenAlexW2065698973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.