Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20573150›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2010

Multifaceted intervention to decrease the rate of severe postpartum haemorrhage: the PITHAGORE6 cluster-randomised controlled trial.

C Deneux-Tharaux, C Dupont, C Colin, M Rabilloud, S Touzet, J Lansac, T Harvey, V Tessier, C Chauleur, G Pennehouat and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How to Improve the Care of Women after Childbirth in the Rooming-in Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

C Deneux-TharauxINSERM, UMR S953, UPMC, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women's and Children's Health, Paris, France. catherine.deneux-tharaux@inserm.fr
C Dupont
C Colin
M Rabilloud
S Touzet
J Lansac
T Harvey
V Tessier
C Chauleur
G Pennehouat
X Morin
M H Bouvier-Colle
R Rudigoz
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRMaternité Port Royal · FRSorbonne Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDecreasing the prevalence of severe postpartum haemorrhages (PPH) is a major obstetrical challenge. These are often considered to be associated with substandard initial care. Strategies to increase the appropriateness of early management of PPH must be assessed. We tested the hypothesis that a multifaceted intervention aimed at increasing the translation into practice of a protocol for early management of PPH, would reduce the incidence of severe PPH.

designCluster-randomised trial. POPULATION: 106 maternity units in six French regions.

methodsMaternity units were randomly assigned to receive the intervention, or to have the protocol passively disseminated. The intervention combined outreach visits to discuss the protocol in each local context, reminders, and peer reviews of severe incidents, and was implemented in each maternity hospital by a team pairing an obstetrician and a midwife.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the incidence of severe PPH, defined as a composite of one or more of: transfusion, embolisation, surgical procedure, transfer to intensive care, peripartum haemoglobin decrease of 4 g/dl or more, death. The main secondary outcomes were PPH management practices.

resultsThe mean rate of severe PPH was 1.64% (SD 0.80) in the intervention units and 1.65% (SD 0.96) in control units; difference not significant. Some elements of PPH management were applied more frequently in intervention units-help from senior staff (P = 0.005), or tended to - second-line pharmacological treatment (P = 0.06), timely blood test (P = 0.09).

conclusionThis educational intervention did not affect the rate of severe PPH as compared with control units, although it improved some practices.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleFranceHospitals, MaternityHumansIncidenceMidwiferyObstetricsPatient Care TeamPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyProfessional PracticeSample SizeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20573150
PMCPMC3178831
OpenAlexW1587529588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.