Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20573084›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2010

Population pharmacokinetics of melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high dose therapy.

Christa E Nath, Peter J Shaw, Judith Trotman, Lihua Zeng, Stephen B Duffull, Gareth Hegarty, Andrew J McLachlan, Howard Gurney, Ian Kerridge, Yiu Lam Kwan and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Final outcomes of escalated melphalan 280 mg/mBone marrow transplantation · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Melphalan 140 mg/mHaematologica · 2018
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimizing high dose melphalan.Blood reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Christa E NathThe Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia. christan@chw.edu.au
Peter J Shaw
Judith Trotman
Lihua Zeng
Stephen B Duffull
Gareth Hegarty
Andrew J McLachlan
Howard Gurney
Ian Kerridge
Yiu Lam Kwan
Peter Presgrave
Campbell Tiley
Douglas Joshua
John Earl
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUConcord Hospital · USUniversity of Otago · NZWestmead Hospital · AUGosford Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo i) investigate the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound plasma melphalan using a population approach, ii) identify clinical factors that affect melphalan disposition and iii) evaluate the role of melphalan exposure in melphalan-related toxicity and disease response.

methodsPopulation pharmacokinetic modelling (using NONMEM) was performed with total and unbound concentration-time data from 100 patients (36-73 years) who had received a median 192 mg m(-2) melphalan dose. Model derived estimates of total and unbound melphalan exposure (AUC) in patients with serious melphalan toxicity and those who had a good disease response (>or=90% decrease in paraprotein concentrations) were compared using the Mann-Whitney test.

resultsA two compartment model generated population mean estimates for total and unbound melphalan clearance (CL) of 27.8 and 128 l h(-1), respectively. Estimated creatinine clearance, fat free mass and haematocrit were important determinants of total and unbound CL, reducing the inter-individual variability in total CL from 34% to 27% and in unbound CL from 42% to 30%. Total AUC (range 4.9-24.4 mg l(-1) h) and unbound AUC (range 1.0-6.5 mg l(-1) h) were significantly higher in patients who had oral mucositis (>or=grade 3) and long hospital admissions (P < 0.01). Patients who responded well had significantly higher unbound AUC (median 3.2 vs. 2.8 mg l(-1) h, P < 0.05) when assessed from diagnosis to post-melphalan and higher total AUC (median 21.3 vs. 13.4 mg l(-1) h, P= 0.06), when assessed from pre- to post-melphalan.

conclusionsCreatinine clearance, fat free mass and haematocrit influence total and unbound melphalan plasma clearance. Melphalan exposure is related to melphalan toxicity while the association with efficacy shows promising trends that will be studied further.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveCreatineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMelphalanMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaMyeloablative AgonistsParaproteinsStatistics, NonparametricCreatineMelphalanMyeloablative AgonistsParaproteinsTransferrin

Identifiers

PMID20573084
PMCPMC2856049
OpenAlexW1767923143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.