Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2010
Activity of aclidinium bromide, a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist: a phase I study.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Aclidinium bromide for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Use of propranolol blockade to explore the pharmacology of GSK961081, a bi-functional bronchodilator, in healthy volunteers: results from two randomized trials.Drugs in R&D · 2014Trial
- Efficacy and safety of once-daily aclidinium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Respiratory research · 2011Trial
- Microbial riboflavin inhibits ceramide synthase 3 to lower ceramide (d18:1/26:0) and delay colorectal cancer progression.Cell metabolism · 2025Article
- New combinations in the treatment of COPD: rationale for aclidinium-formoterol.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016Review
- Aclidinium bromide/formoterol fixed-dose combination therapy for COPD: the evidence to date.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Review
- Long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists for the treatment of chronic airway diseases.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2014Review
- Muscarinic receptor antagonists, from folklore to pharmacology; finding drugs that actually work in asthma and COPD.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Review
- Profile of aclidinium bromide in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAclidinium bromide is a muscarinic antagonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This phase I trial in healthy subjects investigated the bronchodilator activity of aclidinium and its ability to reduce methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.
methodsThis double-blind, partial-crossover study randomized 12 subjects to treatment with single doses of aclidinium (50, 300 or 600 microg) or placebo. Drug activity was assessed for 24 h after administration by specific airway conductance (sGaw), airways resistance (Raw) and bronchial responsiveness (PC35 sGaw methacholine).
resultsAclidinium significantly increased sGaw compared with placebo at all assessments and doses (sGaw mean +/- SD AUC (l kPa(-1) h) for placebo 24.4 +/- 4.37, for 50 microg 29.0 +/- 7.08, for 300 microg 31.2 +/- 6.68 and for 600 microg 32.7 +/- 7.95) (P < 0.009), except 50 microg at 1 and 24 h. Significant decreases in Raw were observed with aclidinium 300 and 600 microg compared with placebo at all assessments (Raw mean +/- SD AUC (kPa s(-1) l(-1) h) for placebo 7.7 +/- 3.46, for 300 microg 5.8 +/- 2.33, for 600 microg 6.3 +/- 3.11) (P < 0.04) except 600 microg at 24 h. Differences between aclidinium 300 and 600 microg vs. placebo in PC35 doubling concentration were significant at all assessments (mean +/- SD AUC (mg ml(-1) h) for placebo 100.0 +/- 30.27, for 50 microg 117.2 +/- 33.33, for 300 microg 168.9 +/- 28.66 and for 600 microg 179.1 +/- 15.73 (P < 0.0001). For all endpoints, there was a significant difference between aclidinium 50 microg and the higher doses (P < 0.0001). Aclidinium was not detected in plasma and was well tolerated.
conclusionAclidinium produced statistically significant and sustained bronchodilation over 24 h, suggesting long-acting efficacy and providing a rationale for future studies in patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.