ReviewCurrent opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000)2010
Using NMR approaches to drive the search for new CNS therapeutics.
Review in Current opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subchronic memantine induced concurrent functional disconnectivity and altered ultra-structural tissue integrity in the rodent brain: revealed by multimodal MRI.Psychopharmacology · 2013Article
- Neurological diseases and pain.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2012Review
- The brain in chronic pain: clinical implications.Pain management · 2011Article
- Can Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improve Success Rates in CNS Drug Discovery?Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2011Article
- Early human screening of medications to treat drug addiction: novel paradigms and the relevance of pharmacogenetics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of MRI-based imaging in drug development has received increased interest recently because of the difficulties associated with the development of CNS pharmacotherapies. While not yet routine, there have been significant advances in imaging that allow this technology to be used for evaluating disease state and drug effects. For disease states, both single and longitudinal studies of non-invasive measures may be obtained to provide a read-out of disease processes and, potentially, to predict the disease state and its evolution. In addition, imaging has enabled the development of improved preclinical disease models based on changes in brain circuitry. Pharmacological MRI, the imaging-based evaluation of drug effects, includes measures of direct effects on the brain, as well as the effects of chronic dosing on brain changes and neurochemical changes associated with these brain effects using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Thus, imaging may become an integrated process in drug development, during both the preclinical and clinical stages. However, validation, the implementation of good clinical practices and regulatory acceptance are hurdles that remain to be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20571972PMC3010855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.