Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20571587›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2010

Adherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis.

Tony J C Harris, Ulrich Tepass

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 494 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
494citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

494 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanical control in dental and jaw morphogenesis and remodeling.International journal of oral science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heterotypic intercellular adhesion tunes efficiency of cell-on-cell migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Opposing Activity at the Apical Surface: An Antagonistic Collaboration Between Crumbs and Myosin II Determines Organ Shape.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Beyond the membrane: rethinking EGFR signaling in physiology and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Building a resilient ovarian reserve: Early soma-oocyte interactions.Current topics in developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Structural Insights into Ordered Multicomponent Assemblies in Cell Junctions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

434 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tony J C HarrisDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada. tony.harris@utoronto.ca
Ulrich Tepass

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How adhesive interactions between cells generate and maintain animal tissue structure remains one of the most challenging and long-standing questions in cell and developmental biology. Adherens junctions (AJs) and the cadherin-catenin complexes at their core are therefore the subjects of intense research. Recent work has greatly advanced our understanding of the molecular organization of AJs and how cadherin-catenin complexes engage actin, microtubules and the endocytic machinery. As a result, we have gained important insights into the molecular mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis.

Indexed as

ActinsAdherens JunctionsAnimalsCadherinsCateninsHumansMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisActinsCadherinsCatenins

Identifiers

PMID20571587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.