Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20571324›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD

Validity of self-reported body weight and height among women including patients with eating disorders.

D Ciarapica, B Mauro, M Zaccaria, C Cannella, A Polito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gestational and postpartum weight change patterns in mothers with eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D CiarapicaFood and Nutrition National Research Institute, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy.
B Mauro
M Zaccaria
C Cannella
A Polito

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported weight and height among women with eating disorders. The study sample consisted of 271 women aged 18-50 yrs: 73 anorexic patients (AN) with a body mass index (BMI) of <18.50 kg/m2, 54 normal weight bulimic or rehabilitated patients (BU/RE: 18.5<BMI<25), 38 overweight/ obese women (OW/OB: BMI> or =25 kg/m2) and 106 normal weight women without an eating disorder (NW: 18.5<BMI<25). Their self-reported body weight (BW) and height were recorded during an interview, and measured using standard procedures, and their self-reported and measured BMI was calculated (kg/m2). In comparison with the measured data, the AN patients tended to overestimate their body weight by 0.48+/-2.05 kg (p<0.05), whereas the OW/OB and BU/RE patients underestimated it (OW/OB: -1.52+/-3.21 kg, p=0.006; BU/RE: -1.12+/-2.60 kg, p=0.003). All of the groups overestimated height by at least 1 cm, and the OW/OB group overestimated it by 2.31+/-2.94 (p=0.00000). These differences were reflected in the significant underestimate of BMI by all groups except the AN patients. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the self-reported and measured variables ranged from 0.95 to 0.98. The results of a Bland & Altman analysis showed that the underestimates of weight and BMI were related to the magnitude of the values (BW: r=-0.24, p<0.000078; BMI: r=-0.37, p<0.00000), the differences being greater with increasing values of weight and BMI; sensitivity as greater for the AN patients. The self-reported data led to a significant misclassification of body mass categories, especially among the BU/RE and OW/OB subjects. Our results show that the over-reporting of height and under-reporting of body weight led to significant underestimates of BMI. The AN subjects seemed to know their weight quite well, whereas the BU/RE and OW/OB women significantly underestimated it. On the basis of these findings, measured weight and height should always be preferred to self-reported values.

Indexed as

Body HeightBody ImageBody WeightSelf ConceptAdultBody Mass IndexFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansLinear ModelsObesityOverweightReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20571324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.