ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2010
Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A methodological assessment of randomization integrity in alteplase for acute ischemic stroke individual patient data meta-analyses.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2016Pooled it
- Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Trial
- Hyperthermic Laser Ablation of Recurrent Glioblastoma Leads to Temporary Disruption of the Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Assessing the role of correlation between efficacy and toxicity endpoints in the performance of Bayesian optimal phase II design.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- A Biomarker Signature-Guided Clinical Trial Design for Precision Medicine.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Bayesian order constrained adaptive design for phase II clinical trials evaluating subgroup-specific treatment effect.Statistical methods in medical research · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- A Signature Enrichment Design with Bayesian Adaptive Randomization.Journal of applied statistics · 2021Article
- Randomized Controlled Trials.Chest · 2020Review
- Time-trend impact on treatment estimation in two-arm clinical trials with a binary outcome and Bayesian response adaptive randomization.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2020Article
- Reporting of master protocols towards a standardized approach: A systematic review.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- A clinical trial design with covariate-adjusted response-adaptive randomization using superiority confidence of treatments.Statistics in biopharmaceutical research · 2019Article
- Biomarker-Driven Oncology Clinical Trials: Key Design Elements, Types, Features, and Practical Considerations.JCO precision oncology · 2019Review
- Adding experimental arms to platform clinical trials: randomization procedures and interim analyses.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Unbiased estimation for response adaptive clinical trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2017Article
- Prediction-Oriented Marker Selection (PROMISE): With Application to High-Dimensional Regression.Statistics in biosciences · 2017Article
- Biomarker-Guided Non-Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith better understanding of the disease's etiology and mechanism, many targeted agents are being developed to tackle the root cause of problems, hoping to offer more effective and less toxic therapies. Targeted agents, however, do not work for everyone. Hence, the development of target agents requires the evaluation of prognostic and predictive markers. In addition, upon the identification of each patient's marker profile, it is desirable to treat patients with best available treatments in the clinical trial accordingly.
methodsMany designs have recently been proposed for the development of targeted agents. These include the simple randomization design, marker stratified design, marker strategy design, efficient targeted design, etc. In contrast to the frequentist designs with equal randomization, we propose novel Bayesian adaptive randomization designs that allow evaluating treatments and markers simultaneously, while providing more patients with effective treatments according to the patients' marker profiles. Early stopping rules can be implemented to increase the efficiency of the designs.
resultsThrough simulations, the operating characteristics of different designs are compared and contrasted. By carefully choosing the design parameters, types I and II errors can be controlled for Bayesian designs. By incorporating adaptive randomization and early stopping rules, the proposed designs incorporate rational learning from the interim data to make informed decisions. Bayesian design also provides a formal way to incorporate relevant prior information. Compared with previously published designs, the proposed design can be more efficient, more ethical, and is also more flexible in the study conduct. LIMITATIONS: Response adaptive randomization requires the response to be assessed in a relatively short time period. The infrastructure must be set up to allow timely and more frequent monitoring of interim results.
conclusionBayesian adaptive randomization designs are distinctively suitable for the development of multiple targeted agents with multiple biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.