Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20570628›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicology2010

Higher susceptibility of the ventral versus the dorsal hippocampus and the posteroventral versus anterodorsal amygdala to soman-induced neuropathology.

James P Apland, Taiza H Figueiredo, Felicia Qashu, Vassiliki Aroniadou-Anderjaska, Adriana P Souza, Maria F M Braga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A rapidFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The KNeuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James P AplandU.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense, Neurobehavioral Toxicology Branch, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010, USA.
Taiza H Figueiredo
Felicia Qashu
Vassiliki Aroniadou-Anderjaska
Adriana P Souza
Maria F M Braga
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUnited States Army · US

Funding

Efficacy of GluR5 Antogonists Against Soman-Induced Seizures and NeuropathologyU01NS058162 · NINDS · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI BRAGA, MARIA F. · 2006 to 2016
$4.5M
Antiglutamatergic Therapy to Protect the Immature Brain Against Nerve AgentsU01NS102135 · NINDS · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI BRAGA, MARIA F. · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
Targeting the Glutamatergic System to Counteract Soman Toxicity in Immature RatsR21NS094131 · NINDS · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI BRAGA, MARIA F. · 2015 to 2016
$744k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS094131NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS058162NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS102135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nerve agents are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, exposure to which causes brain damage, primarily by inducing intense seizure activity. Knowledge of the brain regions that are most vulnerable to nerve agent-induced brain damage can facilitate the development of drugs targeting the protection of these regions. Both the amygdala and the hippocampus have been shown to suffer significant damage after nerve agent exposure, but the amygdala appears to be the more severely affected structure. However, damage in the amygdala has generally been compared with damage in the dorsal hippocampus, whereas there is evidence that the ventral hippocampus is significantly more susceptible to seizures than the dorsal region and, therefore, it may also be more susceptible to nerve agent-induced neuropathology. Here, we report that after status epilepticus induced by soman administration to rats, neuronal degeneration as assessed by Fluoro-Jade C staining was more extensive in the ventral than the dorsal hippocampal subfields, 1 day after soman exposure. Seven days later, the difference between dorsal and ventral regions was not statistically significant. In the amygdala, soman-induced neurodegeneration was more severe in the posteroventral regions of the lateral, basolateral, and medial nuclei compared to the anterodorsal regions of these nuclei. In contrast, the basomedial nucleus was more severely affected in the anterodorsal region. The extent of neurodegeneration in the amygdala was not significantly different from that in the ventral hippocampus. However, when compared with the whole hippocampus, the amygdala displayed more severe neurodegeneration, on both day 1 and day 7 after soman exposure. Testing the protective efficacy of drugs against nerve agent-induced brain damage should include examination of the ventral hippocampus and the posteroventral regions of the amygdala, as these areas are most vulnerable to nerve agent-induced neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsCholinesterase InhibitorsDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityFluoresceinsHippocampusMaleNerve DegenerationNeurotoxicity SyndromesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySeizuresSomanTime FactorsCholinesterase InhibitorsFluoresceinsfluoro-jade CSoman

Identifiers

PMID20570628
PMCPMC2933957
OpenAlexW2047615712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.