Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20569587›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2006

Angioplasty of an idiopathic intracranial arterial stenosis.

K F Layton, D F Kallmes, H J Cloft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K F LaytonBaylor University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX, USA - klayton@americanrad.com.
D F Kallmes
H J Cloft
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USBaylor University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryTreatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis usually involves maximizing medical therapy. In patients with medically refractory symptoms despite maximum pharmacologic therapy, intracranial angioplasty and/or stenting has become an accepted treatment option. The use of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for idiopathic intracranial stenoses has not been reported to date.We describe a case of idiopathic intracranial stenosis which was refractory to medical therapy and was successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The presenting symptoms included multiple episodes of aphasia and right-sided weakness as well as a left basal ganglia infarct. The patient underwent treatment with two intracranial angioplasty procedures. There was a recurrence of the stenosis and symptoms following the first procedure. However, after a second treatment with a slightly larger balloon, flow in the MCA normalized. Furthermore, the symptoms attributed to her MCA stenosis had essentially resolved. This case suggests that patients with medically refractory idiopathic intracranial stenosis can be successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Identifiers

PMID20569587
PMCPMC3354600
OpenAlexW2145040742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.