Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20568226›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2010

Origin of cardiac progenitor cells in the developing and postnatal heart.

Elizabeth N Kuhn, Sean M Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cardiac Progenitor Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Epigenomes in Cardiovascular Disease.Circulation research · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of cardiogenesis in cardiovascular progenitor cells.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cardiac regeneration: different cells same goal.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2011
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth N KuhnCardiovascular Research Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sean M Wu

Funding

Induced pluripotent stem cells in the understanding and treatment of heart diseaseU01HL099776 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LONGAKER, MICHAEL T, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2009 to 2015
$8.2M
Generation of functional organs via developmental chimerismDP2OD004411 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, SEAN M · 2008 to 2008
$2.5M
Cardiac Progenitor Cells in Development and DiseaseK08HL081086 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WU, SEAN M · 2005 to 2010
$657k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL081086NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099776NIH HHS DP2 OD004411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian heart lacks the capacity to replace the large numbers of cardiomyocytes lost due to cardiac injury. Several different cell-based routes to myocardial regeneration have been explored, including transplantation of cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes into injured myocardium. As seen with cell-based therapies in other solid organ systems, inherent limitations, such as host immune response, cell death and long-term graft instability have hampered meaningful cardiac regeneration. An understanding of the cell biology of cardiac progenitors, including their developmental origin, lineage markers, renewal pathways, differentiation triggers, microenvironmental niche, and mechanisms of homing and migration to the site of injury, will enable further refinement of therapeutic strategies to enhance clinically meaningful cardiac repair.

Indexed as

AnimalsHeartHumansMammalsMyocytes, CardiacStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID20568226
PMCPMC3620291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.