Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20568023›Full record

Trial reportNeurocritical care2010

Use of Conivaptan (Vaprisol) for hyponatremic neuro-ICU patients.

Andrew M Naidech, James Paparello, Storm M Liebling, Storm M Leibling, Sarice L Bassin, Kimberly Levasseur, Mark J Alberts, Richard A Bernstein, Kenji Muro

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurocritical care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00727090 phase4terminatednot on this map

Use of Conivaptan (Vaprisol) for Hyponatremic Neuro-ICU Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2008 to 2010Enrolled6ConditionsHyponatremiaArmsConivaptan
NCT03000283 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Conivaptan for the Reduction of Cerebral Edema in Intracerebral Hemorrhage- A Safety and Tolerability Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJesse CorryRan2017 to 2019Enrolled7ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Cerebral Edema, Intracerebral Hemorrhage, StrokeArmsConivaptan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for chronic non-hypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Thyroid emergencies.Polish archives of internal medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Vasopressin receptor antagonists.Current hypertension reports · 2015
    Review
  9. Management of hyponatremia.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2014
    Review
  10. Sodium and fluid management in acute brain injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2012
    Review
  11. Vaptans and hyponatremia in critical patients.Translational medicine @ UniSa · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Leibling, Storm M [corrected to Liebling, Storm M]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew M NaidechDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. a-naidech@northwestern.edu
James Paparello
Storm M Liebling
Storm M Leibling
Sarice L Bassin
Kimberly Levasseur
Mark J Alberts
Richard A Bernstein
Kenji Muro
Northwestern University · USNorthwestern Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyponatremia is common in neurocritical care and is associated with poor outcome, but the optimal treatment is not known. We wished to test the hypothesis that for neurocritical care patients with severe hyponatremia (Na < 130 mmol/l) or hyponatremia (Na < 135 mmol/l) with depressed Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) that conivaptan use would lead to increased serum sodium compared to usual care.

methodsWe prospectively screened 249 neurocritical care patients with hyponatremia for a prospective, randomized pilot (goal N = 20) trial. Study interventions were usual care, or usual care plus conivaptan 20 mg IV as a bolus followed by 20 mg IV over 24 h, the lower FDA-approved dose. Patients were prospectively followed for changes in serum and urine electrolytes and clinical examinations with a blinded examiner. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00727090).

resultsDespite the prevalence of hyponatremia, recruitment was difficult, and the study was terminated after six patients were enrolled, three in each group. Most hyponatremia in screened but non-randomized patients was transient or not associated with depressed GCS. Conivaptan led to higher serum sodium compared to usual care. The change in serum sodium from baseline, the pre-specified endpoint, was significantly different between groups at six (7.0 +/- 1.7 vs. -0.6 +/- 2.1 mmol/l, P = 0.008), 24 (9.7 +/- 3.2 vs. 0 +/- 1.0 mmol/l), and 36 h (8.0 +/- 5.6 vs. -1.7 +/- 2.1 mmol/l, P = 0.05). There were no apparent differences in clinical examination as a result of treatment. Adverse events were similar, and all randomized patients completed the protocol.

conclusionsDespite an inclusive protocol, most patients were not candidates for conivaptan therapy for hyponatremia. The role of conivaptan in the Neuro-ICU remains to be defined.

Indexed as

Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor AntagonistsIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedBenzazepinesCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansHyponatremiaInjections, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAntidiuretic Hormone Receptor AntagonistsBenzazepinesconivaptanSodium

Identifiers

PMID20568023
OpenAlexW2073999097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.