Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20567995›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2011

Action of SN 28049, a new DNA binding topoisomerase II-directed antitumour drug: comparison with doxorubicin and etoposide.

Catherine J Drummond, Graeme J Finlay, Laura Broome, Elaine S Marshall, Emma Richardson, Bruce C Baguley

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. DNA-Binding Anticancer Drugs: One Target, Two Actions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine J DrummondAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. cath.drummond@newcastle.ac.uk
Graeme J Finlay
Laura Broome
Elaine S Marshall
Emma Richardson
Bruce C Baguley
Cancer Society of New Zealand · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe have examined the cellular action of SN 28049 (N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-2,6-dimethyl-1-oxo-1,2-dihydrobenzo[b]-1,6-naphthyridine-4-carboxamide), a DNA binding drug with curative activity against the Colon 38 transplantable murine carcinoma, on human tumour cells. Its action has been compared with that of two topoisomerase II-targetted drugs, etoposide and doxorubicin.

methodsThe NZM3 melanoma and HCT116 colon carcinoma cell lines, each expressing wild-type p53, were cultured and responses were compared by flow cytometry, electrophoresis, microscopy, and growth of tumour xenografts.

resultsResponses of NZM3 cells to all three drugs, as measured by histone H2AX γ-phosphorylation, induction of the p53 pathway and cell cycle arrest, were comparable and typical of those of topoisomerase II poisons. Xenografts of NZM3 cells responded to SN 28049 with a tumour growth delay of 16 days. In contrast, HCT116 cells had an attenuated DNA damage response to the drugs and SN 28049 had no in vivo activity, consistent with low topoisomerase II activity. However, SN 28049 inhibited HCT116 cell growth in vitro and activated the p53 pathway to induce a state with G(2)/M-phase DNA content, low mitotic index and a high proportion of binucleate cells. Treated cells expressed cyclin E and the senescence marker β-galactosidase but showed low expression of cyclin B and survivin. In comparison, etoposide caused little p53 expression or cycle arrest, and doxorubicin had an intermediate effect.

conclusionThe action of SN 28049 in NZM3 cells is typical of a topoisomerase II poison, but the low topoisomerase IIα activity of HCT116 cells allowed the detection of a second antiproliferative action of SN 28049 in which cells undergo post-mitotic cycle arrest and induction of p53.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDoxorubicinEtoposidefas ReceptorFlow CytometryG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHCT116 CellsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Antigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDoxorubicinEtoposideFAS protein, humanfas ReceptorN-(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)-2,6-dimethyl-1-oxo-1,2-dihydroxybenzo(b)-1,6-naphthyridine-4-carboxamideNaphthyridinesTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20567995
OpenAlexW1970223508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.