Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20567988›Full record

ArticleArchives of virology2010

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry.

Yuxuan Hou, Cheng Peng, Meng Yu, Yan Li, Zhenggang Han, Fang Li, Lin-Fa Wang, Zhengli Shi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The science of the host-virus network.Nature microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Epigenetic alterations and genetic variations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2: potential clinical implications.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. TheScience bulletin · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The evolutionary history of ACE2 usage within the coronavirus subgenusbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?Environmental chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuxuan HouState Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Cheng Peng
Meng Yu
Yan Li
Zhenggang Han
Fang Li
Lin-Fa Wang
Zhengli Shi
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNWuhan Institute of Virology · CNAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of SARS-like coronavirus in bats suggests that bats could be the natural reservoir of SARS-CoV. However, previous studies indicated the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein, a known SARS-CoV receptor, from a horseshoe bat was unable to act as a functional receptor for SARS-CoV. Here, we extended our previous study to ACE2 molecules from seven additional bat species and tested their interactions with human SARS-CoV spike protein using both HIV-based pseudotype and live SARS-CoV infection assays. The results show that ACE2s of Myotis daubentoni and Rhinolophus sinicus support viral entry mediated by the SARS-CoV S protein, albeit with different efficiency in comparison to that of the human ACE2. Further, the alteration of several key residues either decreased or enhanced bat ACE2 receptor efficiency, as predicted from a structural modeling study of the different bat ACE2 molecules. These data suggest that M. daubentoni and R. sinicus are likely to be susceptible to SARS-CoV and may be candidates as the natural host of the SARS-CoV progenitor viruses. Furthermore, our current study also demonstrates that the genetic diversity of ACE2 among bats is greater than that observed among known SARS-CoV susceptible mammals, highlighting the possibility that there are many more uncharacterized bat species that can act as a reservoir of SARS-CoV or its progenitor viruses. This calls for continuation and expansion of field surveillance studies among different bat populations to eventually identify the true natural reservoir of SARS-CoV.

Indexed as

Virus InternalizationAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsChiropteraDisease ReservoirsGenetic VariationHeLa CellsHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutant ProteinsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Membrane GlycoproteinsMutant ProteinsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusRNA, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike glycoprotein, SARS-CoVspike protein, mouse hepatitis virusViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20567988
PMCPMC7086629
OpenAlexW2082231154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.