Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20567830›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2010

[S100 protein positive sustentacular cells in pulmonary carcinoids and thoracic paragangliomas: differential diagnostic and prognostic evaluation].

A Warth, S Krysa, T Zahel, H Hoffmann, P Schirmacher, P A Schnabel, E Herpel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phenotyping of pulmonary carcinoids and a Ki-67-based grading approach.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A WarthInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 220/221, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. arne.warth@med.uni-heidelberg.de
S Krysa
T Zahel
H Hoffmann
P Schirmacher
P A Schnabel
E Herpel
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paragangliomas have a classical histomorphology comprising a so-called "Zellballen" or nesting pattern with surrounding S100 protein positive sustentacular cells (SC) which form a meshwork with a wire-fence appearance. In adrenal and extra-adrenal paragangliomas the prevalence of SC is inversely associated with the patients' outcome. In order to get more insight into the prevalence as well as the prognostic and differential diagnostic value of this cell population in pulmonary carcinoids, we investigated a panel of 26 tumorlets, 147 typical and atypical pulmonary carcinoids and ten thoracic paragangliomas immunohistochemically. We were able to demonstrate that S100 protein positive cells are similarly distributed in both thoracic paragangliomas and pulmonary carcinoids. Hence, the presence and distribution of these cells does not appear to represent a reliable criterion in differential diagnosis. Moreover, all pulmonary carcinoid patients with a worse outcome had low numbers of or no S100 protein positive cells in their tissue specimens. Thus, the prevalence of these cells may potentially aid in prognostic assessment of pulmonary carcinoids, especially in biopsies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarcinoid TumorCell CountDiagnosis, DifferentialEpithelial CellsGlomus Jugulare TumorHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLungLung NeoplasmsParagangliomaPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisS100 ProteinsThoracic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorS100 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20567830
OpenAlexW1481723799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.