Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2010
The role of chemotherapeutic drugs in the evaluation of breast tumour response to chemotherapy using serial FDG-PET.
Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted 18f-fdg pet/ct for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The accuracy ofEuropean radiology · 2017Pooled it
- Assessment of response to endocrine therapy using FDG PET/CT in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012Trial
- [La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Article
- Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Early Standardized Uptake Value Reduction in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of breast cancer · 2022Article
- Article
- ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the early prediction of pathological response in aggressive subtypes of breast cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for use in clinical trials.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Review
- Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.The oncologist · 2015Review
- Assessment of tumor response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using (18)F-FLT: a meta-analysis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2014Article
- Are we ready for an early evaluation of the response of axillary lymph node metastases to neoadjuvant therapy?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aims of this study were to investigate whether drug sequence (docetaxel followed by anthracyclines or the drugs in reverse order) affects changes in the maximal standard uptake volume (SUVmax) on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.
methodsWomen were randomly assigned to receive either drug sequence, and FDG-PET scans were taken at baseline, after four cycles and after eight cycles of chemotherapy. Tumour response to chemotherapy was evaluated based on histology from a surgical specimen collected upon completion of chemotherapy.
resultsSixty women were enrolled into the study. Thirty-one received docetaxel followed by anthracyclines (Arm A) and 29 received drugs in the reverse order (Arm B). Most women (83%) had ductal carcinoma and 10 women (17%) had lobular or lobular/ductal carcinoma. All but one tumour were downstaged during therapy. Overall, there was no significant difference in response between the two drug regimens. However, women in Arm B who achieved complete pathological response had mean FDG-PET SUVmax reduction of 87.7% after four cycles, in contrast to those who had no or minor pathological response. These women recorded mean SUVmax reductions of only 27% (P < 0.01). Women in Arm A showed no significant difference in SUVmax response according to pathological response. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values were highest in women in Arm B.
conclusionsOur results show that SUVmax uptake by breast tumours during chemotherapy can be dependent on the drugs used. Care must be taken when interpreting FDG-PET in settings where patients receive varied drug protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.