Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20565953›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2010

The role of chemotherapeutic drugs in the evaluation of breast tumour response to chemotherapy using serial FDG-PET.

Michal E Schneider-Kolsky, Stewart Hart, Jane Fox, Peter Midolo, John Stuckey, Michael Hofman, Vinod Ganju

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The accuracy ofEuropean radiology · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  5. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Assessment of tumor response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using (18)F-FLT: a meta-analysis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michal E Schneider-KolskyDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Wellington Road, Victoria 3800, Australia. michal.schneider-kolsky@med.monash.edu.au
Stewart Hart
Jane Fox
Peter Midolo
John Stuckey
Michael Hofman
Vinod Ganju
Monash Medical Centre · AUMoorabbin Hospital · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aims of this study were to investigate whether drug sequence (docetaxel followed by anthracyclines or the drugs in reverse order) affects changes in the maximal standard uptake volume (SUVmax) on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.

methodsWomen were randomly assigned to receive either drug sequence, and FDG-PET scans were taken at baseline, after four cycles and after eight cycles of chemotherapy. Tumour response to chemotherapy was evaluated based on histology from a surgical specimen collected upon completion of chemotherapy.

resultsSixty women were enrolled into the study. Thirty-one received docetaxel followed by anthracyclines (Arm A) and 29 received drugs in the reverse order (Arm B). Most women (83%) had ductal carcinoma and 10 women (17%) had lobular or lobular/ductal carcinoma. All but one tumour were downstaged during therapy. Overall, there was no significant difference in response between the two drug regimens. However, women in Arm B who achieved complete pathological response had mean FDG-PET SUVmax reduction of 87.7% after four cycles, in contrast to those who had no or minor pathological response. These women recorded mean SUVmax reductions of only 27% (P < 0.01). Women in Arm A showed no significant difference in SUVmax response according to pathological response. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative predictive values were highest in women in Arm B.

conclusionsOur results show that SUVmax uptake by breast tumours during chemotherapy can be dependent on the drugs used. Care must be taken when interpreting FDG-PET in settings where patients receive varied drug protocols.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsAdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularChemotherapy, AdjuvantDocetaxelErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedAnthracyclinesDocetaxelErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID20565953
PMCPMC2917032
OpenAlexW2082976808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.