SynthesisBMC neurology2010
A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis.
Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 295 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
295 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Very late-onset myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex distribution, thymic pathology and autoantibodies.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Various Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes - a systematic review of case reports and case series.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Health economic evaluations of myasthenia gravis: a systematic review.Croatian medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- Rituximab for myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Diabetes mellitus in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endocrine · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function and functional outcomes in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and Myasthenic Syndromes: A Systematic Review.Neuroepidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of FcRn inhibitors in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk factors for pregnancy-related clinical outcome in myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of Myasthenia Gravis in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review.Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2022Pooled it
- Global prevalence of myasthenia gravis and the effectiveness of common drugs in its treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab for Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab for Treating Myasthenia Gravis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Psychometric analysis of the Neuro-QoL Fatigue in generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG) using data from a phase 3 trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Low-intensity aerobic cycle ergometer effects on lung function of myasthenia gravis patients: A randomized controlled trial.Narra J · 2024Trial
- A controlled clinical study on efficacy and safety of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for treating ocular myasthenia gravis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- A population-based legacy study of myasthenia gravis in Iceland: insights from a small Arctic nation.International journal of circumpolar health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Diseases: Opportunities for a Data-Scarce Field.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
235 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim was to collate all myasthenia gravis (MG) epidemiological studies including AChR MG and MuSK MG specific studies. To synthesize data on incidence rate (IR), prevalence rate (PR) and mortality rate (MR) of the condition and investigate the influence of environmental and technical factors on any trends or variation observed.
methodsStudies were identified using multiple sources and meta-analysis performed to calculate pooled estimates for IR, PR and MR.
results55 studies performed between 1950 and 2007 were included, representing 1.7 billion population-years. For All MG estimated pooled IR (eIR): 5.3 per million person-years (C.I.:4.4, 6.1), range: 1.7 to 21.3; estimated pooled PR: 77.7 per million persons (C.I.:64.0, 94.3), range 15 to 179; MR range 0.1 to 0.9 per millions person-years. AChR MG eIR: 7.3 (C.I.:5.5, 7.8), range: 4.3 to 18.0; MuSK MG IR range: 0.1 to 0.32. However marked variation persisted between populations studied with similar methodology and in similar areas.
conclusionsWe report marked variation in observed frequencies of MG. We show evidence of increasing frequency of MG with year of study and improved study quality. This probably reflects improved case ascertainment. But other factors must also influence disease onset resulting in the observed variation in IR across geographically and genetically similar populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.