Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20564164›Full record

ArticleCancer2010

Timing of palliative care referral and symptom burden in phase 1 cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

David Hui, Henrique Parsons, Linh Nguyen, Shana L Palla, Sriram Yennurajalingam, Razelle Kurzrock, Eduardo Bruera

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Association between the timing of palliative care consultation and end-of-life outcomes in patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Use of supportive care services and advance care planning among early phase oncology clinical trial participants.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Geographic variation in palliative care delivery among patients diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer in the USA: Medicare population-based study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Supportive Care: An Indispensable Component of Modern Oncology.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Can early palliative care with anticancer treatment improve overall survival and patient-related outcomes in advanced lung cancer patients? A review of the literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Review
  19. The Role of Palliative Care in Oncology.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David HuiDepartment of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Henrique Parsons
Linh Nguyen
Shana L Palla
Sriram Yennurajalingam
Razelle Kurzrock
Eduardo Bruera
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Parenteral Hydration in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled TrialR01CA122292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BRUERA, EDUARDO · 2006 to 2009
$2.2M
Methylphenidate for Fatigue in Advanced Cancer PatientsR01NR010162 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BRUERA, EDUARDO · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
Morphine versus Methadone as First Line Strong Opioid for Cancer PainR01CA124481 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BRUERA, EDUARDO · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122292NCI NIH HHS R01CA122292-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124481NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124481-01NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010162NINR NIH HHS R01NR010162-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhase 1 trials offer patients with advanced cancer the opportunity to pursue life-prolonging cancer treatments. In the current study, the timing of referral and symptom burden between patients referred to palliative care by phase 1 oncologists and those referred by non-phase 1 oncologists were compared.

methodsAll 57 patients with advanced solid tumors who were referred by phase 1 oncologists to the palliative care outpatient clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) between 2007 and 2008 were included. The comparison cohort was comprised of 114 non-phase 1 patients who were stratified by age, sex, and cancer diagnosis in a 1:2 ratio. Information regarding patient characteristics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), timing of referral, and survival was retrieved.

resultsBoth cohorts had the following matched characteristics: average age of 57 years, with 44% of the patients being female and 47% having gastrointestinal cancers. At the time of palliative care consultation, patients referred by phase 1 oncologists were more likely than patients referred by non-phase 1 oncologists to have a better performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1: 61% vs 36% [P = .003). The ESAS was not significantly different with the exception of better well-being in the phase 1 cohort (mean, 4.5 vs 5.5; P = .03). No difference was found for the duration between registration at MDACC and palliative care consultation (13 months vs 11 months; P = .41) and overall survival from the time of palliative care consultation (5 months vs 4 months; P = .69).

conclusionsOutpatients referred to palliative care by phase 1 oncologists were found to have a better performance status but similar symptom burden compared with patients referred by non-phase 1 oncologists. Patients with phase 1 involvement did not appear to have delayed palliative care referral compared with non-phase 1 patients. The results of the current study support the development of a simultaneous care model.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationCohort StudiesDepressionFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPainQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20564164
PMCPMC2936661
OpenAlexW1988308780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.