Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20564143›Full record

ArticleCancer2010

Phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel for recurrent/refractory nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Suresh S Ramalingam, R Donald Harvey, Nabil Saba, Taofeek K Owonikoko, John Kauh, Dong M Shin, Shi-Yong Sun, Sandra Strychor, Mourad Tighiouart, Merrill J Egorin and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Phase II study of docetaxel in combination with everolimus for second- or third-line therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2013
    Trial
  3. HighOncotarget · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Translational, Pharmacodynamic, and Pharmacokinetic Phase IB Clinical Study of Everolimus in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oncogenic driver mutations in lung cancer.Translational respiratory medicine · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Biological Role of PI3K Pathway in Lung Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inhibitors of mTOR.The oncologist · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suresh S RamalingamDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. ssramal@emory.edu
R Donald Harvey
Nabil Saba
Taofeek K Owonikoko
John Kauh
Dong M Shin
Shi-Yong Sun
Sandra Strychor
Mourad Tighiouart
Merrill J Egorin
Haian Fu
Fadlo R Khuri
Winship Cancer InstituteEmory University · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Targeting Microtubules and HDAC6 in NSCLCP01CA116676 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KHURI, FADLO RAJA · 2006 to 2012
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P01 CA116676-03NCI NIH HHS P01 CA116676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEverolimus is a novel inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, which is aberrantly activated in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors conducted a phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of everolimus and docetaxel for recurrent NSCLC.

methodsPatients with advanced stage NSCLC and progression after prior platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. Sequential cohorts were treated with escalating doses of docetaxel (Day 1) and everolimus (orally daily, Days 1-19) every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic sampling of everolimus and docetaxel was done in Cycle 1. The primary endpoint was determination of the recommended phase 2 doses of the combination.

resultsTwenty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 62 years; women, 11; number of prior regimens, 1 [n=13], 2 [n=6], >or=3 [n=5]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, 0 [n=6], 1 [n=17]). The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were fever with grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3 fatigue, and grade 3 mucositis. None of the 7 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and everolimus 5 mg daily) experienced DLT. Everolimus area under the concentration time curve (AUC) was not different with 60 or 75 mg/m2 docetaxel. Mean+/-standard deviation AUC-based accumulation factors for everolimus on Days 8 and 15 were 1.16+/-0.37 and 1.42+/-0.42, respectively. Docetaxel Day 1 half-life was 9.4+/-3.4 hours. Among 21 patients evaluable, 1 had a partial response, and 10 had disease stabilization.

conclusionsThe recommended phase 2 doses of docetaxel and everolimus for combination therapy are 60 mg/m2 and 5 mg orally daily, respectively. Promising anticancer activity has been noted.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDocetaxelDrug Administration ScheduleEverolimusFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceSirolimusTaxoidsDocetaxelEverolimusSirolimusTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID20564143
PMCPMC2940062
OpenAlexW2019697444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.