Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20564112›Full record

Trial reportCancer2010

A study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bortezomib in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma: a phase 2 consortium study.

Gary A Croghan, Vera J Suman, William J Maples, Mark Albertini, Gerald Linette, Lawrence Flaherty, John Eckardt, Cynthia Ma, Svetomir N Markovic, Charles Erlichman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A phase I trial of bortezomib and interferon-α-2b in metastatic melanoma.Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997) · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NF-κB as potential target in the treatment of melanoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gary A CroghanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Melanoma Study Group, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. croghan.gary@mayo.edu
Vera J Suman
William J Maples
Mark Albertini
Gerald Linette
Lawrence Flaherty
John Eckardt
Cynthia Ma
Svetomir N Markovic
Charles Erlichman
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWashington University in St. Louis · USJacksonville College · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · USWayne State University · US

Funding

TAS:: 75 0850 ::TAS RECOVERY ACT - ACTNOW CLINICAL TRIAL 8288N01CM62205 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ERLICHMAN, CHARLES · 2007 to 2011
$8.0M
Gene Regulation E.coli Database Intergrated EnvironmentR01GM062205 · NIGMS · UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTONOMA DE MEXICO · PI COLLADO-VIDES, JULIO · 2001 to 2003
$375k
NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062204NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062205NCI NIH HHS N01 CM62205NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy has not been reported to have a significant impact on survival for patients with metastatic melanoma. Bortezomib was shown to have additive/synergistic effects with several chemotherapeutic agents, including paclitaxel and platinum. A phase 1 trial of this 3-drug combination reported that 6 of 28 patients treated with bortezomib followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin achieved a partial response (including 2 of 5 patients with metastatic melanoma).

methodsA 2-stage phase 2 clinical trial was conducted to assess the antitumor activity of this 3-agent combination in patients with metastatic melanoma who had received at most 1 prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Treatment included bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1, 4, and 8; paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2; and carboplatin at an area under the concentration (AUC) of 6 on Day 2 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of this trial was tumor response rate (TRR).

resultsSeventeen eligible patients were enrolled. A median of 4 cycles were administered (range, 1-7 cycles). Three patients discontinued treatment due to persistent grade 4 (based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) neutropenia with grade 3 leukopenia (2 patients) or grade 4 pulmonary embolism (1 patient). Grade>or=3 toxicities included neutropenia (71%), leukopenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (29%), and arthralgia (12%). Two partial responses were observed (TRR, 11.8%). Four patients had stable disease at >12 weeks. The median progression-free survival was 3.2 months, and the median overall survival was 7.0 months.

conclusionsDue to insufficient clinical efficacy, this trial did not proceed to second-stage accrual. The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bortezomib demonstrated limited clinical benefit and was associated with significant toxicity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBoronic AcidsBortezomibCarboplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPaclitaxelBoronic AcidsBortezomibCarboplatinPaclitaxelPyrazines

Identifiers

PMID20564112
PMCPMC3860743
OpenAlexW1978729515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.