Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20563881›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2010

Perinatal periods of risk: analytic preparation and phase 1 analytic methods for investigating feto-infant mortality.

William M Sappenfield, Magda G Peck, Carol S Gilbert, Vera R Haynatzka, Thomas Bryant

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William M SappenfieldDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Bill_Sappenfield@doh.state.fl.us
Magda G Peck
Carol S Gilbert
Vera R Haynatzka
Thomas Bryant

Funding

MATERNAL, INFANT &REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: NATIONAL/STATE COALITION CAPACITYU65DP724969 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SIMPSON, PATRICK S · 2005 to 2009
$2.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5 U65 DP724969-05PHS HHS U50/CCU300860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR) methods provide the necessary framework and tools for large urban communities to investigate feto-infant mortality problems. Adapted from the Periods of Risk model developed by Dr. Brian McCarthy, the six-stage PPOR approach includes epidemiologic methods to be used in conjunction with community planning processes. Stage 2 of the PPOR approach has three major analytic parts: Analytic Preparation, which involves acquiring, preparing, and assessing vital records files; Phase 1 Analysis, which identifies local opportunity gaps; and Phase 2 Analyses, which investigate the opportunity gaps to determine likely causes of feto-infant mortality and to suggest appropriate actions. This article describes the first two analytic parts of PPOR, including methods, innovative aspects, rationale, limitations, and a community example. In Analytic Preparation, study files are acquired and prepared and data quality is assessed. In Phase 1 Analysis, feto-infant mortality is estimated for four distinct perinatal risk periods defined by both birthweight and age at death. These mutually exclusive risk periods are labeled Maternal Health and Prematurity, Maternal Care, Newborn Care, and Infant Health to suggest primary areas of prevention. Disparities within the study community are identified by comparing geographic areas, subpopulations, and time periods. Excess mortality numbers and rates are estimated by comparing the study population to an optimal reference population. This excess mortality is described as the opportunity gap because it indicates where communities have the potential to make improvement.

Indexed as

Fetal MortalityInfant MortalityRisk AssessmentBirth WeightFemaleFloridaGestational AgeHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant WelfareMaleMaternal Health Services

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.