Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20563626›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2010

Comparison of DC Bead-irinotecan and DC Bead-topotecan drug eluting beads for use in locoregional drug delivery to treat pancreatic cancer.

Richard E J Forster, Sharon A Small, Yiqing Tang, Clare L Heaysman, Andrew W Lloyd, Wendy Macfarlane, Gary J Phillips, Milan D Antonijevic, Andrew L Lewis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DC BeadM1™: towards an optimal transcatheter hepatic tumour therapy.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Locoregional drug delivery using image-guided intra-arterial drug eluting bead therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Review
  13. Preparation and characterization of ketoprofen-loaded microspheres for embolization.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard E J ForsterBiocompatibles UK Ltd., Farnham Business Park, Weydon Lane, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 8QL, UK.
Sharon A Small
Yiqing Tang
Clare L Heaysman
Andrew W Lloyd
Wendy Macfarlane
Gary J Phillips
Milan D Antonijevic
Andrew L Lewis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DC Bead is a drug delivery embolisation system that can be loaded with doxorubicin or irinotecan for the treatment of a variety of liver cancers. In this study we demonstrate that the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan hydrochloride can be successfully loaded into the DC Bead sulfonate-modified polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel matrix, resulting in a sustained-release drug eluting bead (DEBTOP) useful for therapeutic purposes. The in vitro drug loading capacity, elution characteristics and the effects on mechanical properties of the beads are described with reference to our previous work with irinotecan hydrochloride (DEBIRI). Results showed that drug loading was faster when the solution was agitated compared to static loading and a maximum loading of ca. 40-45 mg topotecan in 1 ml hydrated beads was achievable. Loading the drug into the beads altered the size, compressibility moduli and colour of the bead. Elution was shown to be reliant on the presence of ions to perform the necessary exchange with the electrostatically bound topotecan molecules. Topotecan was shown by MTS assay to have an IC(50) for human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells (PSN-1) of 0.22 and 0.27 microM compared to 28.1 and 19.2 microM for irinotecan at 48 and 72 h, respectively. The cytotoxic efficacy of DEBTOP on PSN-1 was compared to DEBIRI. DEPTOP loaded at 6 & 30 mg ml(-1), like its free drug form, was shown to be more potent than DEBIRI of comparable doses at 24, 48 & 72 h using a slightly modified MTS assay. Using a PSN-1 mouse xenograft model, DEBIRI doses of 3.3-6.6 mg were shown to be well-tolerated (even with repeat administration) and effective in reducing the tumour size. DEBTOP however, was lethal after 6 days at doses of 0.83-1.2 mg but demonstrated reasonable efficacy and tolerability (again with repeat injection possible) at 0.2-0.4 mg doses. Care must therefore be taken when selecting the dose of topotecan to be loaded into DC Bead given its greater potency and potential toxicity.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinCell Line, TumorHumansIrinotecanPancreatic NeoplasmsTopotecanAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinIrinotecanTopotecan

Identifiers

PMID20563626
PMCPMC2935541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.