ArticleTranslational oncology2010
Limitations of a murine transgenic breast cancer model for studies of erythropoietin-induced tumor progression.
Article in Translational oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of erythropoietin on normal and neoplastic cells.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse effects of erythropoietin (EPO) on tumor progression and survival were observed in recent phase 3 oncology trials. However, mechanisms remain poorly understood. We tested the effects of exogenous EPO on murine B16F10 melanoma growth in a subcutaneous tumor transplant model, and for the first time, in a model of spontaneous tumor formation within autochthonous epithelial tissues using murine mammary tumor virus promoter polyoma virus middle T antigen (MMTV-PyMT) transgenic mice. EPO receptor (EPOR) messenger RNA (mRNA) was detectable in both B16F10 tumors and mammary tumors from MMTV-PyMT mice but was 0.12 +/- 0.02% and 1.3 +/- 0.91% of the EPOR mRNA level in murine erythroid HCD-57 cells, respectively. B16F10 tumor growth rates in mice treated for 3 weeks with 30 microg/kg per week of darbepoetin alpha, 0.41 inverse days (range, 0.05-0.69 inverse days; n = 16), were similar to tumor growth rates observed in mice treated with PBS, 0.42 inverse days (range, 0.10-0.69 inverse days; n = 17). In contrast, darbepoetin alpha raised hematocrit levels to 0.593 (maximum, 0.729) compared with 0.448 (maximum, 0.532) in PBS-treated mice (P = .0004). In MMTV-PyMT mice, the weights of tumor-bearing mammary glands in mice treated for 6 weeks with 30 microg/kg per week of darbepoetin alpha, 3.37 g (range, 1.94-5.81 g; n = 27), did not significantly differ from the weights in PBS-treated mice, 3.76 g (range, 2.30-6.33 g; n = 26). In contrast, darbepoetin alpha raised hematocrit levels to 0.441 (maximum, 0.606) compared with 0.405 (maximum, 0.492) in PBS-treated mice (P = .05). Thus, effects of exogenous EPO on tumor growth were not recapitulated in these murine tumor models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.