Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20561224›Full record

ReviewOral diseases2010

Optical diagnostics in the oral cavity: an overview.

P Wilder-Smith, J Holtzman, J Epstein, A Le

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oral diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. OCT-Based Periodontal Inspection Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Interactive OCT-Based Tooth Scan and Reconstruction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Wide-field in vivo oral OCT imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P Wilder-SmithBeckman Laser Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. pwsmith@uci.edu
J Holtzman
J Epstein
A Le

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Joel E Milam · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
WOUND MIGRATION FORCE MONITORINGP41RR001192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MANTULIN, WILLIAM W. · 1985 to 2011
$14.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the emphasis shifts from damage mitigation to disease prevention or reversal of early disease in the oral cavity, the need for sensitive and accurate detection and diagnostic tools become more important. Many novel and emergent optical diagnostic modalities for the oral cavity are becoming available to clinicians with a variety of desirable attributes including: (i) non-invasiveness, (ii) absence of ionizing radiation, (iii) patient-friendliness, (iv) real-time information (v) repeatability, and (vi) high-resolution surface and subsurface images. In this article, the principles behind optical diagnostic approaches, their feasibility and applicability for imaging soft and hard tissues, and their potential usefulness as a tool in the diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions, dental pathologies, and other dental applications will be reviewed. The clinical applications of light-based imaging technologies in the oral cavity and of their derivative devices will be discussed to provide the reader with a comprehensive understanding of emergent diagnostic modalities.

Indexed as

Optical DevicesDiagnostic ImagingFluorescenceHumansLasersLightMouth DiseasesSpectrum AnalysisTomography, Optical CoherenceTooth DiseasesTransillumination

Identifiers

PMID20561224
PMCPMC4080924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.