ArticleImmunology2010
Novel method for isolating untouched rat natural killer cells with higher purity compared with positive selection and fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
Article in Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type I IFN-Driven Immune Cell Dysregulation in Rat Autoimmune Diabetes.ImmunoHorizons · 2021Article
- Unbiased Screening Identifies Functional Differences in NK Cells After Early Life Psychosocial Stress.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Ex Vivo Major Histocompatibility Complex I Knockdown Prolongs Rejection-free Allograft Survival.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018Article
- Effect of systemic injection of heterogenous and homogenous opioids on peripheral cellular immune response in rats with bone cancer pain: A comparative study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Article
- Mouse lung and spleen natural killer cells have phenotypic and functional differences, in part influenced by macrophages.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cells are important effectors of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Although human and mouse NK cells are extensively characterized, much less is known about the rat cells, partly because of the current lack of reliable isolation techniques. We aimed to develop a method for isolating highly pure 'untouched' rat NK cells by negative selection from splenocytes. Thereafter, we characterized them phenotypically and functionally in comparison with those isolated by positive selection targeting the NKR-P1 receptor. Our novel method isolated highly pure untouched NK cells reproducibly with 97 ± 0.7% (n = 7), 96.6 ± 0.8% (n = 3) and 88.3 ± 1.5% (n = 9) in LEWIS, Fischer and athymic nude rats, respectively. The positively selected NK cells were less homogeneous and exhibited undesired method-related activation profiles. Resting negatively selected NK cells were less proliferative and less robust compared with positively selected NK cells. Although resting positively selected NK cells were more cytotoxic, interleukin-2 (IL-2) activation increased the cytotoxicity of negatively selected cells three-fold. The negatively selected NK cells responded to cross-linking of the NKR-P1 receptor by calcium mobilization from intracellular stores. However, combined IL-2 and IL-12 activation resulted in significantly more interferon-γ release from positively selected NK cells. This new NK-cell isolation method will allow a deeper insight into rat NK-cell phenotypes and the roles of their receptors in the biology of these cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.