Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20560867›Full record

ReviewCell communication & adhesion2010

Directed stem cell differentiation: the role of physical forces.

Kelly C Clause, Li J Liu, Kimimasa Tobita

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell communication & adhesion, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of the MCF-7 Exhausted Medium on hADSC Behaviour.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Extended lifespan and improved genome stability in HepaRG-derived cell lines through reprogramming by high-density stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Modeling development using hydrogels.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Eph/Ephrin-Based Protein Complexes: The Importance ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly C ClauseCardiovascular Development Research Program, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Li J Liu
Kimimasa Tobita
University of Pittsburgh · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Three-Dimensional Cardiac Gel Bioreactor for Functioning Cardiomyocyte Induction R21HL094402 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TOBITA, KIMIMASA · 2009 to 2010
$410k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL094402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of factors contribute to the control of stem cell fate. In particular, the evidence for how physical forces control the stem cell differentiation program is now accruing. In this review, the authors discuss the types of physical forces: mechanical forces, cell shape, extracellular matrix geometry/properties, and cell-cell contacts and morphogenic factors, which evidence suggests play a role in influencing stem cell fate.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ShapeExtracellular MatrixHumansMiceStem CellsStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID20560867
PMCPMC3285265
OpenAlexW2086100872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.