Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20560005›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2009

Role of animal models in HCM research.

Rhian Shephard, Christopher Semsarian

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular genetics made simple.Global cardiology science & practice · 2012
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. TargetedJournal of cardiovascular development and disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rhian ShephardAgnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Locked Bag 6, Newtown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.
Christopher Semsarian
Centenary Institute · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex cardiovascular genetic disorder characterized by marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Major advances have been made in the clinical characterization of patients with HCM and in identifying causative gene mutations. However, many questions remain regarding the underlying disease mechanisms. Furthermore, in a disease where no pharmacological treatments currently exists which can either prevent or cause regression of disease, processes to identify novel therapies are the crucial next steps. Animal models of HCM have already proved to be universally useful in confirming gene causation and dissecting out key molecular pathways involved in the development of HCM and its sequelae, including heart failure and sudden death. These findings have led to studies in animal models investigating novel therapeutic approaches in HCM, specifically targeting the development and progression of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and heart failure. This review will provide a brief summary of some of the key animal models of HCM and how these models have been utilized to understand disease mechanisms and to investigate new potential therapies. Ongoing studies using animal models of HCM will lead to a greater understanding of disease pathogenesis and will facilitate the translation of these findings to improved clinical outcomes in HCM patients.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicCardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, FamilialDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsDisease ProgressionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPhenotypePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID20560005
OpenAlexW2086537914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.