Imaging of angiogenesis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico Models of Lymphangiogenesis in Solid Malignancies.Cancers · 2022
   Review
2. Regenerative Approaches and Future Trends for the Treatment of Corneal Burn Injuries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Review
3. Current Concepts in Multi-Modality Imaging of Solid Tumor Angiogenesis.Cancers · 2020
   Review
4. Biodistribution and Internal Radiation Dosimetry ofCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals · 2018
   Article
5. Imaging of Integrin αCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals · 2017
   Article
6. Non-invasive dynamic near-infrared imaging and quantification of vascular leakage in vivo.Angiogenesis · 2013
   Article
7. FIZZ1 could enhance the angiogenic ability of rat aortic endothelial cells.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2013
   Article
8. Molecular MRI differentiation of VEGF receptor-2 levels in C6 and RG2 glioma models.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2013
   Article
9. Tumor angiogenesis phenotyping by nanoparticle-facilitated magnetic resonance and near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as