ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2010
A tool predicting future mean arterial blood pressure values improves the titration of vasoactive drugs.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closed-loop vasopressor control: in-silico study of robustness against pharmacodynamic variability.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVasoactive drug infusion rates are titrated to achieve a desired effect, e.g., mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), rather than using infusion rates based on body weight. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a method to automatically identify a patient's sensitivity to sodium-nitroprusside, dobutamine or dopamine and to evaluate, whether an advisory system that predicts MAP 5 min in the future enhances a clinician's ability to titrate sodium-nitroprusside infusions.
methodsWe used published models implemented in MATLAB to simulate the response of 100 individual patients to infusions of sodium-nitroprusside, dopamine and dobutamine. The simulated patient's sensitivity to the three drugs was identified using an adaptive filter approach, where MAP was altered in a binary stepwise fashion. Next, 9 nurses were asked to control the MAP of 6 of the simulated patients. For half of the patients, we used the identified sensitivity to predict and display MAP 5 min into the future.
resultsIdentifying each individual patient's sensitivity improved the accuracy of the MAP prediction by 75% for sodium-nitroprusside, 82% for dopamine and 52% for dobutamine over the MAP prediction based on an "average" patient's sensitivity. The advisory system shortened the median time to reach the desired MAP from 10.2 to 4.1 min, decreased the median number of infusion rate changes from 6 to 4, and resulted in a significant reduction of mental workload and effort. DISCUSSION: Patient-specific drug sensitivity identifi- cation significantly improved the prediction of future MAP. By predicting and displaying the expected MAP 5 min in the future, the advisory system helped nurses titrate faster, reduced their perceived workload and might improve patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.