ArticleMedical microbiology and immunology2010
Rapid quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood by a new molecular assay based on automated sample preparation and real-time PCR.
Article in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Detecting Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Using Real-Time PCR: A Comparison Study Between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube Systems.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2017Article
- Fully automated quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in whole blood with the new sensitive Abbott RealTime CMV assay in the era of the CMV international standard.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
- Comparative evaluation of the QIAsymphony RGQ system with the easyMAG/R-gene combination for the quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA load in whole blood.Virology journal · 2012Article
- Clinical significance of low cytomegalovirus DNA levels in human plasma.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Recent publications in medical microbiology and immunology: a retrospective.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2012Review
- Cytomegalovirus DNA quantification using an automated platform for nucleic acid extraction and real-time PCR assay setup.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in whole blood samples has gained significance in the routine diagnostic laboratory. In this study, the analytical performance of the artus™ CMV RG PCR kit in conjunction with automated sample preparation on the new QIAsymphony™ SP instrument was evaluated. Clinically referred samples were tested and results compared to those obtained with the routinely used molecular test system. Accuracy testing showed results to be within ±0.2 log(10) unit of the expected panel results. The assay was linear (R = 0.9972) from a lower quantification limit of 148 copies/ml to 1.3 × 10(7) copies/ml. The between-day imprecision CV was 8-63%, and the within-run imprecision CV was 16-61%. When 100 clinically referred samples were tested, results obtained with the new test system showed an acceptable concordance with those obtained with the routinely used easyMAG™ sample preparation and CMV HHV6,7,8 R-gene™ test system. Discrepant results were found with low-titer samples containing CMV DNA concentrations under the lower limit of quantification or within half a log unit above. The time to results was comparable for both test systems. The QIAsymphony™ sample preparation and artus™ CMV RG PCR test system allows for a rapid, sensitive, precise, and accurate high-throughput quantitation of CMV DNA in whole blood in the routine diagnostic laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.