Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20559759›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2010

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone treatment in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Shinsuke Iida, Takaaki Chou, Shinichiro Okamoto, Hirokazu Nagai, Kiyohiko Hatake, Hirokazu Murakami, Toshiyuki Takagi, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Henry Lau, Kenichi Takeshita and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00555100 (A Multicenter, Phase I Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Lenalidomide With and Without Dexamethasone in Japanese Subjects With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00555100 phase1completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Phase I Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Lenalidomide With and Without Dexamethasone in Japanese Subjects With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelgeneRan2007 to 2010Enrolled15ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmslenalidomide, dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Myelomatous meningitis: a case report.International journal of hematology · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Patient with refractory multiple myeloma developing eosinophilia after lenalidomide treatment and lung cancer 9 months later: case report and review of the literature.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shinsuke IidaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Japan. iida@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp
Takaaki Chou
Shinichiro Okamoto
Hirokazu Nagai
Kiyohiko Hatake
Hirokazu Murakami
Toshiyuki Takagi
Kazuyuki Shimizu
Henry Lau
Kenichi Takeshita
Masaaki Takatoku
Tomomitsu Hotta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a multicenter, open-label study to investigate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma The study was composed of the "monotherapy phase", a dose-escalation phase, to determine the tolerability to single agent lenalidomide and the "combination phase" to determine the safety and obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. The primary end points were the tolerability to 25 mg lenalidomide and safety. Nine and six patients were enrolled in the monotherapy phase and the combination phase, respectively. Since 25 mg of monotherapy treatment did not satisfy the DLT criteria, this dose was employed in the combination phase. The major adverse event was myelosuppression. At the planned interim analysis (median study duration, 26.3 weeks), grade 3 or grade 4 neutropenia was observed with high frequency (66.7%). However, all adverse events observed were clinically manageable. In the combination cohort, the overall response rate (> or =PR) was 100%. The pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide showed rapid absorption and elimination after both single and multiple doses. In conclusion, 25 mg of lenalidomide was given safely as a single agent or in combination with dexamethasone in Japanese patients. The good efficacy of the combination therapy was also demonstrated in this study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaSalvage TherapyThalidomideTreatment OutcomeDexamethasoneLenalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.