ArticleMaternal and child health journal2010
Perinatal periods of risk: phase 2 analytic methods for further investigating feto-infant mortality.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infant mortality and causes of infant deaths in 2018, in Adana, Turkey.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Endothelial Microvesicles and Soluble Markers of Endothelial Injury in Critically Ill Newborns.Mediators of inflammation · 2018Article
- Perinatal Periods of Risk Analysis: Disentangling Race and Socioeconomic Status to Inform a Black Infant Mortality Community Action Initiative.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Article
- Contribution of maternal age and pregnancy checkbox on maternal mortality ratios in the United States, 1978-2012.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017Article
- Investigating the Decline of Fetal and Infant Mortality Rates in Alaska During 2010 and 2011.Maternal and child health journal · 2016Article
- Application of a Mixed Methods Approach to Identify Community-Level Solutions to Decrease Racial Disparities in Infant Mortality.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2014Article
- Contributors to excess infant mortality in the U.S. South.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014Article
- Excess infant mortality among Native Hawaiians: identifying determinants for preventive action.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- Developing a standard approach to examine infant mortality: findings from the State Infant Mortality Collaborative (SIMC).Maternal and child health journal · 2012Article
- Perinatal periods of risk: analytic preparation and phase 1 analytic methods for investigating feto-infant mortality.Maternal and child health journal · 2010Article
- Integrated approaches to improve birth outcomes: perinatal periods of risk, infant mortality review, and the Los Angeles Mommy and Baby Project.Maternal and child health journal · 2010Article
- Perinatal periods of risk: a community approach for using data to improve women and infants' health.Maternal and child health journal · 2010Article
- Infant Mortality: Development of a Proposed Update to the Dollfus Classification of Infant Deaths.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The perinatal periods of risk (PPOR) methods provide a framework and tools to guide large urban communities in investigating their feto-infant mortality problem. The PPOR methods have 11 defined steps divided into three analytic parts: (1) Analytic Preparation; (2) Phase 1 Analysis-identifying the opportunity gaps or populations and risk periods with largest excess mortality; and (3) Phase 2 Analyses-investigating these opportunity gaps. This article focuses on the Phase 2 analytic methods, which systematically investigate the opportunity gaps to discover which risk and preventive factors are likely to have the largest effect on improving a community's feto-infant mortality rate and to provide additional information to better direct community prevention planning. This article describes the last three PPOR epidemiologic steps for investigating identified opportunity gaps: identifying the mechanism for excess mortality; estimating the prevalence of risk and preventive factors; and estimating the impact of these factors. While the three steps provide a common strategy, the specific analytic details are tailored for each of the four perinatal risk periods. This article describes the importance, prerequisites, alternative approaches, and challenges of the Phase 2 methods. Community examples of the methods also are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20559697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.