Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20559640›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2010

Calcium-dependent control of temporal processing in an auditory interneuron: a computational analysis.

Abhilash Ponnath, Hamilton E Farris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tonotopic CaJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Local prothoracic auditory neurons in Ensifera.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Stimulus change detection in phasic auditory units in the frog midbrain: frequency and ear specific adaptation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abhilash PonnathCenter for Neuroscience and Kresge Hearing Laboratories, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier St., New Orleans, LA 70119, USA.
Hamilton E Farris

Funding

SYNAPTIC AND EXTRASYNAPTIC NMDA RECEPTORS AND NEUROPROTECTIVE LIPID SIGNALINGP20RR016816 · NCRR · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI HONG, SONG · 2002 to 2011
$20.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016816NCRR NIH HHS P20RR016816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitivity to acoustic amplitude modulation in crickets differs between species and depends on carrier frequency (e.g., calling song vs. bat-ultrasound bands). Using computational tools, we explore how Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms underlying selective attention can contribute to such differences in amplitude modulation sensitivity. For omega neuron 1 (ON1), selective attention is mediated by Ca(2+)-dependent feedback: [Ca(2+)](internal) increases with excitation, activating a Ca(2+)-dependent after-hyperpolarizing current. We propose that Ca(2+) removal rate and the size of the after-hyperpolarizing current can determine ON1's temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF). This is tested using a conductance-based simulation calibrated to responses in vivo. The model shows that parameter values that simulate responses to single pulses are sufficient in simulating responses to modulated stimuli: no special modulation-sensitive mechanisms are necessary, as high and low-pass portions of the TMTF are due to Ca(2+)-dependent spike frequency adaptation and post-synaptic potential depression, respectively. Furthermore, variance in the two biophysical parameters is sufficient to produce TMTFs of varying bandwidth, shifting amplitude modulation sensitivity like that in different species and in response to different carrier frequencies. Thus, the hypothesis that the size of after-hyperpolarizing current and the rate of Ca(2+) removal can affect amplitude modulation sensitivity is computationally validated.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, TheoreticalAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCalciumGryllidaeInterneuronsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID20559640
PMCPMC2936461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.