Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20558995›Full record

ArticleHuman heredity2010

A latent class model for testing for linkage and classifying families when the sample may contain segregating and non-segregating families.

Laurel A Bastone, Richard S Spielman, Xingmei Wang, Thomas R Ten Have, Mary E Putt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human heredity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurel A BastoneGlobal Biometrics Science, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pennington, N.J., USA.
Richard S Spielman
Xingmei Wang
Thomas R Ten Have
Mary E Putt
University of Pennsylvania · USBristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DE

Funding

TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS OF MENTAL RETARDATIONP30HD026979 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ROBERTS, TIMOTHY P · 1990 to 2015
$15.3M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008216 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EPSTEIN, DOUGLAS J · 1987 to 2023
$8.3M
Genome-wide analysis of genetic variation expressionR01HG002386 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SPIELMAN, RICHARD S · 2001 to 2006
$4.7M
Genome-wide analysis of genetic variation and expression.R01GM081930 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEUNG, VIVIAN G · 2007 to 2010
$3.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG 002386NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002386NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD026979NIGMS NIH HHS GM081930NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081930NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008216NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM08216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a quantitative trait locus (QTL) study, it is usually not feasible to select families with offspring that simultaneously display variability in more than one phenotype. When multiple phenotypes are of interest, the sample will, with high probability, contain 'non-segregating' families, i.e. families with both parents homozygous at the QTL. These families potentially reduce the power of regression-based methods to detect linkage. Moreover, follow-up studies in individual families will be inefficient, and potentially even misleading, if non-segregating families are selected for the study. Our work extends Haseman-Elston regression using a latent class model to account for the mixture of segregating and non-segregating families. We provide theoretical motivation for the method using an additive genetic model with two distinct functions of the phenotypic outcome, squared difference (SqD) and mean-corrected product (MCP). A permutation procedure is developed to test for linkage; simulation shows that the test is valid for both phenotypic functions. For rare alleles, the method provides increased power compared to a 'marginal' approach that ignores the two types of families; for more common alleles, the marginal approach has better power. These results appear to reflect the ability of the algorithm to accurately assign families to the two classes and the relative weights of segregating and non-segregating families to the test of linkage. An application of Bayes rule is used to estimate the family-specific probability of segregating. High predictive value positive values for segregating families, particularly for MCP, suggest that the method has considerable value for identifying segregating families. The method is illustrated for gene expression phenotypes measured on 27 candidate genes previously demonstrated to show linkage in a sample of 14 families.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationGenetic LinkageModels, GeneticComputer SimulationFamilyGenetic MarkersHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilityQuantitative Trait LociSiblingsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20558995
PMCPMC2952184
OpenAlexW2045157112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.