Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20558798›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2010

Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.

Syed M Ahmed, Ann-Gel S Palermo

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Female allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant survivors' perspectives on cervical cancer screening: a retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  19. Development of a Community-engaged Research Training Workshop for Clinician-Scientists and Early-stage Investigators.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Syed M AhmedDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthy Communities, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 53226-0509, USA. sahmed@mcw.edu
Ann-Gel S Palermo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement in research may enhance a community's ability to address its own health needs and health disparities issues while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. However, there are researchers with limited understanding of and experience with effective methods of engaging communities. Furthermore, limited guidance is available for peer-review panels on evaluating proposals for research that engages communities. The National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives developed a community engagement framework that includes values, strategies to operationalize each value, and potential outcomes of their use, as well as a peer-review framework for evaluating research that engages communities. Use of these frameworks for educating researchers to create and sustain authentic community-academic partnerships will increase accountability and equality between the partners.

Indexed as

Peer Review, ResearchResearch PersonnelAdvisory CommitteesCommunicationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationCooperative BehaviorGuidelines as TopicHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansModels, EducationalNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Power, PsychologicalProfessional RoleProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID20558798
PMCPMC2901283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.