ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2010
Hybrid model integrating immunohistochemistry and expression profiling for the classification of carcinomas of unknown primary site.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Molecular Genetics of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review Focused on Clinical Relevance.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Review
- Predicting Cancer Tissue-of-Origin by a Machine Learning Method Using DNA Somatic Mutation Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- TOOme: A Novel Computational Framework to Infer Cancer Tissue-of-Origin by Integrating Both Gene Mutation and Expression.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- [The role of pathology in the diagnostics of CUP syndrome].Der Radiologe · 2014Review
- p21 Protein Outperforms Clinico-pathological Criteria in Predicting Liver Metastases in Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of the site of origin for 'malignancy with unknown primary' remains a challenge for modern pathology. Correct diagnosis is critical to defining the most beneficial treatment for the patient. Standard pathological approaches combine morphology and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies to first subclassify cytokeratin-positive carcinomas into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma. Subsequently, organ-specific IHC-markers, if available, are used to assign the tumor's primary site of origin. Previous gene expression classifiers have shown promise in tumor classification but cannot readily be integrated into standard practice because they ignore the algorithmic hierarchy used by pathologists. Here we present a novel hybrid approach integrating a hierarchy of gene expression classifiers into the algorithmic method used with IHC. In this method, a tumor is initially assigned to one of the carcinoma subclasses by the top tier classifier. Dependent on initial classification, one of three second-tier classifiers assign primary site resulting in both carcinoma subtype and primary site classification. First tier classifier accuracies were 89%, 88%, and 75% for cross-validation, independent, and institutional independent test sets, respectively. Second tier accuracies were 87%, 90%, and 87% for adenocarcinoma, squamous, and neuroendocrine carcinoma respectively. Therefore, we can successfully separate the four main subtypes of carcinoma and subsequently assign primary site by incorporation of gene expression-based classifiers into the standard algorithmic pathology approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.