Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20558171›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2010

New monoclonal anti-mouse DC-SIGN antibodies reactive with acetone-fixed cells.

Cheolho Cheong, Ines Matos, Jae-Hoon Choi, Joseph D Schauer, Durga Bhavani Dandamudi, Elina Shrestha, Jessy A Makeyeva, Xiaojun Li, Pingwei Li, Ralph M Steinman and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The role of the vascular dendritic cell network in atherosclerosis.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheolho CheongLaboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology and Chris Browne Center for Immunology and Immune Diseases, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Ines Matos
Jae-Hoon Choi
Joseph D Schauer
Durga Bhavani Dandamudi
Elina Shrestha
Jessy A Makeyeva
Xiaojun Li
Pingwei Li
Ralph M Steinman
Chae Gyu Park
Rockefeller University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Viral Pathogenesis and TherapeuticsU54AI057158 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LIPKIN, W. IAN · 2003 to 2014
$100.8M
Structural Basis of Immune Recognition of Glycosylated AntigensU54GM062116 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SASISEKHARAN, RAM · 2001 to 2010
$80.3M
Properties of Mouse of Dendritic Cells and MacrophagesR01AI013013 · NIAID · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI MOJSOV, SVETLANA · 1985 to 2015
$8.9M
Dendritic Cells and the Pathogenesis of HIV-1 InfectionR37AI040045 · NIAID · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI STEINMAN, RALPH MARVIN · 2001 to 2010
$6.1M
PROPERTIES OF MOUSE DENDRITIC CELLS AND MACROPHAGESR37AI013013 · NIAID · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI STEINMAN, RALPH M. · 1986 to 1995
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI 057158NIAID NIH HHS AI 13013NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040045NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI013013NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI040045NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057158NIGMS NIH HHS GM62116NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM062116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse DC-SIGN CD209a is a type II transmembrane protein, one of a family of C-type lectin genes syntenic and homologous to human DC-SIGN. Current anti-mouse DC-SIGN monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are unable to react with DC-SIGN in acetone-fixed cells, limiting the chance to visualize DC-SIGN in tissue sections. We first produced rabbit polyclonal PAb-DSCYT14 against a 14-aa peptide in the cytosolic domain of mouse DC-SIGN, and it specifically detected DC-SIGN and not the related lectins, SIGN-R1 and SIGN-R3 expressed in transfected CHO cells. MAbs were generated by immunizing rats and DC-SIGN knockout mice with the extracellular region of mouse DC-SIGN. Five rat IgG2a or IgM MAbs, named BMD10, 11, 24, 25, and 30, were selected and each MAb specifically detected DC-SIGN by FACS and Western blots, although BMD25 was cross-reactive to SIGN-R1. Two mouse IgG2c MAbs MMD2 and MMD3 interestingly bound mouse DC-SIGN but at 10 fold higher levels than the rat MAbs. When the binding epitopes of the new BMD and two other commercial rat anti-DC-SIGN MAbs, 5H10 and LWC06, were examined by competition assays, the epitopes of BMD11, 24, and LWC06 were identical or closely overlapping while BMD10, 30, and 5H10 were shown to bind different epitopes. MMD2 and MMD3 epitopes were on a 3rd noncompeting region of mouse DC-SIGN. DC-SIGN expressed on the cell surface was sensitive to collagenase treatment, as monitored by polyclonal and MAb. These new reagents should be helpful to probe the biology of DC-SIGN in vivo.

Indexed as

AcetoneAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCell Adhesion MoleculesCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusCross ReactionsDC-Specific ICAM-3 Grabbing NonintegrinEpitope MappingEpitopesFemaleHybridomasImmunizationLectins, C-TypeAcetoneAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCell Adhesion MoleculesDC-Specific ICAM-3 Grabbing NonintegrinEpitopesLectins, C-TypeReceptors, Cell SurfaceRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSIGNR3 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID20558171
PMCPMC2924951
OpenAlexW1989423710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.