SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02687412 (Fast-track Surgery After Gynaecological Oncological Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fast-track Surgery After Gynaecological Oncological Surgery
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs for Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Pooled it
- Fast-Track Programs for Liver Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2014Pooled it
- Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Identifying and resolving the frustrations of reviewing the improvement literature: The experiences of two improvement researchers.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): New Concepts in the Perioperative Management of Gynecologic Surgery.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018Article
- Minor laparoscopic liver resection: toward 1-day surgery?Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- 'Am I really ready to go home?': a qualitative study of patients' experience of early discharge following an enhanced recovery programme for liver resection surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Identification of promising strategies to sustain improvements in hospital practice: a qualitative case study.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit.ISRN surgery · 2012Article
- Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynaecological malignancies contribute to 10 to 15% of cancers in women internationally. In recent years, a trend towards new perioperative care strategies has been documented as "Fast Track (FT) surgery", or "Enhanced Recovery Programmes" to replace some traditional approaches in surgical care. The FT multimodal programmes may enhance the postoperative recovery by means of reducing surgical stress. This systematic review aims to fully assess the beneficial and harmful effects of FT programmes in gynaecological cancer care.
objectivesTo evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of FT programmes in gynaecological cancer care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases, The Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Collaborative Review Group's Trial Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 4, 2009, MEDLINE and EMBASE to November 2009. In addition, all reference lists of included trials were searched and experts in the gynaecological oncology community were contacted in an attempt to locate trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any type of FT programmes for surgery in gynaecological cancer to conventional recovery strategies were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion. Since no RCTs were identified, data collection and analysis could not be performed. MAIN
resultsNo studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe currently have no evidence from high quality studies to support or refute the use of perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Further well-designed RCTs with standard FT programmes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20556792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.