SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- New and emerging immune-targeted drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- New and Emerging Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: What is New and What is to Come.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2012Article
- Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis and treatment.Current neuropharmacology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anti-CD25 treatment of daclizumab appears to be effective in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) as regards clinical and MRI outcomes. Moreover, there are no severe safety concerns arising from clinical testing so far.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of daclizumab for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis Group trials register (September 2009), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2009), EMBASE (January 1985 to September 2009). At the same time, we handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials, reports (September 2009) from the most important neurological associations and MS Societies in Europe and America, contacted researchers who were participating in trials on daclizumab. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating daclizumab, alone or combined with other treatments versus placebo, or any other treatment for patients with RRMS. Both parallel group and cross-over designs were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed references retrieved for possible inclusion. All disagreements were resolved by an independent party. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN
resultsWe found no study meeting our inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAlthough studies examining daclizumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis were located, methodologic limitations resulted in the exclusion of all studies. Some of the studies were labelled as crossover trials, however they only compared the effect of different interventions for the same individual. The true randomized crossover trial should compare the effect of different groups, which receive the same intervention, only with the difference in sequence. In other words, the crossover comparison should be between the different groups, rather than on the individual between pretreatment and post treatment. At the same time, all the individuals should be randomly allocated to different groups. There was also a rigorous randomized controlled trial, but the follow-up was shorter than one year (only 44 weeks). In general, daclizumab is safe and well tolerated in combination of interferon treated multiple sclerosis population. Improvements in methodology in future studies are required for meaningful synthesis of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.