Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20556775›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Juan B Cabello, Amanda Burls, José I Emparanza, Sue Bayliss, Tom Quinn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01787110 (DETermination of the Role of OXygen in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01787110 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

DETermination of the Role of OXygen in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction (DETO2X-AMI) Based on the SWEDEHEART Registry

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2013 to 2016Enrolled6,629ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Non-ST Elevation (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction, Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Angina, UnstableArmsOxygen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. [Author reply].Der Anaesthesist · 2013
    Article
  16. Hyperoxia during early reperfusion does not increase ischemia/reperfusion injury.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan B CabelloDepartamento de Cardiologia & CASP Spain, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Pintor Baeza 12, Alicante, Alicante, Spain, 03010.
Amanda Burls
José I Emparanza
Sue Bayliss
Tom Quinn
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxygen (O(2)) is widely recommended for patients with myocardial infarction yet a narrative review has suggested it may do more harm than good. Systematic reviews have concluded that there was insufficient evidence to know whether oxygen reduced, increased or had no effect on the heart ischaemia or infarct size.

objectivesTo review the evidence from randomised controlled trials to establish whether routine use of inhaled oxygen in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves patient-centred outcomes, in particular pain and death. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following bibliographic databases were searched (to the end of February 2010): Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and PASCAL, British Library ZETOC, Web of Science ISI Proceedings. Experts were also contacted to identify any studies. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of people with suspected or proven AMI, less than 24 hours after onset, in which the intervention was inhaled oxygen (at normal pressure) compared to air and regardless of co-therapies provided these were the same in both arms of the trial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of identified studies to see if they met the inclusion criteria and independently undertook the data extraction. The quality of studies and the risk of bias were assessed according to guidance in the Cochrane Handbook. The primary outcomes were death, pain and complications. The measure of effect used was the relative risk (RR). MAIN

resultsThree trials involving 387 patients were included and 14 deaths occurred. The pooled RR of death was 2.88 (95% CI 0.88 to 9.39) in an intention-to-treat analysis and 3.03 (95% CI 0.93 to 9.83) in patients with confirmed AMI. While suggestive of harm, the small number of deaths recorded meant that this could be a chance occurrence. Pain was measured by analgesic use. The pooled RR for the use of analgesics was 0.97 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.20). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no conclusive evidence from randomised controlled trials to support the routine use of inhaled oxygen in patients with acute AMI. A definitive randomised controlled trial is urgently required given the mismatch between trial evidence suggestive of possible harm from routine oxygen use and recommendations for its use in clinical practice guidelines.

Indexed as

Oxygen Inhalation TherapyHumansMyocardial InfarctionRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20556775
OpenAlexW4247541054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.