Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20556749›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.

Nicky A Cullum, Deyaa Al-Kurdi, Sally Em Bell-Syer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Alginate dressings for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Role of Ultrasound-Based Therapies in Cardiovascular Diseases.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Development of Low Frequency (20-100 kHz) Clinically Viable Ultrasound Applicator for Chronic Wound Treatment.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Wound bed preparation: TIME for an update.International wound journal · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. New techniques for wound debridement.International wound journal · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicky A CullumDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, North Yorkshire, UK, YO10 5DD.
Deyaa Al-Kurdi
Sally Em Bell-Syer
University of York · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous leg ulcers pose a significant burden for patients and healthcare systems. Ultrasound (US) may be a useful treatment for these ulcers.

objectivesTo determine whether US increases the healing of venous leg ulcers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 24 February 2010); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2010); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to February Week 2 2010); In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (searched 24 February 2010); Ovid EMBASE 1980 to 2010 Week 07; EBSCO CINAHL 1982 to 24 February 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US with no US. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the search results and selected eligible studies. Details from included studies were summarised using a data extraction sheet, and double-checked. We tried to contact trial authors for missing data. MAIN

resultsEight trials were included; all had unclear, or high, risks of bias, with differences in duration of follow-up, and US regimens. Six trials evaluated high frequency US and five of these reported healing at 7 - 8 weeks. Significantly more patients healed with US than without it at 7 - 8 weeks (pooled RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.96), but later assessments at 12 weeks showed the increased risk of healing with US was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20). One poor-quality study of high-frequency US found no evidence of an effect on healing after three weeks' treatment.Two trials evaluated low frequency US and reported healing at different time points. Both trials reported no evidence of a difference in the proportion of ulcers healed with US compared with no US: both were significantly underpowered. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe trials evaluating US for venous leg ulcers are small, poor-quality and heterogeneous. There is no reliable evidence that US hastens healing of venous ulcers. There is a small amount of weak evidence of increased healing with US, but this requires confirmation in larger, high-quality RCTs. There is no evidence of a benefit associated with low frequency US.

Indexed as

Ultrasonic TherapyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVaricose UlcerWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID20556749
OpenAlexW4248402632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.