SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Alginate dressings for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- A pilot study evaluating non-contact low-frequency ultrasound and underlying molecular mechanism on diabetic foot ulcers.International wound journal · 2014Trial
- Use of weekly, low dose, high frequency ultrasound for hard to heal venous leg ulcers: the VenUS III randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Trial
- Role of Ultrasound-Based Therapies in Cardiovascular Diseases.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Review
- Overcoming biological barriers to improve treatment of a Staphylococcus aureus wound infection.Cell chemical biology · 2023Article
- Development of Low Frequency (20-100 kHz) Clinically Viable Ultrasound Applicator for Chronic Wound Treatment.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019Article
- Article
- The venous ulcer continues to be a clinical challenge: an update.Burns & trauma · 2018Review
- Wound bed preparation: TIME for an update.International wound journal · 2016Review
- Wound healing treatment by high frequency ultrasound, microcurrent, and combined therapy modifies the immune response in rats.Brazilian journal of physical therapy · 2016Article
- Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC medicine · 2015Review
- Electrical Stimulation and Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Review of Clinical Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Overview of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of venous leg ulcers: a US perspective.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2014Review
- New techniques for wound debridement.International wound journal · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous leg ulcers pose a significant burden for patients and healthcare systems. Ultrasound (US) may be a useful treatment for these ulcers.
objectivesTo determine whether US increases the healing of venous leg ulcers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 24 February 2010); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2010); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to February Week 2 2010); In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (searched 24 February 2010); Ovid EMBASE 1980 to 2010 Week 07; EBSCO CINAHL 1982 to 24 February 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US with no US. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the search results and selected eligible studies. Details from included studies were summarised using a data extraction sheet, and double-checked. We tried to contact trial authors for missing data. MAIN
resultsEight trials were included; all had unclear, or high, risks of bias, with differences in duration of follow-up, and US regimens. Six trials evaluated high frequency US and five of these reported healing at 7 - 8 weeks. Significantly more patients healed with US than without it at 7 - 8 weeks (pooled RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.96), but later assessments at 12 weeks showed the increased risk of healing with US was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.20). One poor-quality study of high-frequency US found no evidence of an effect on healing after three weeks' treatment.Two trials evaluated low frequency US and reported healing at different time points. Both trials reported no evidence of a difference in the proportion of ulcers healed with US compared with no US: both were significantly underpowered. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe trials evaluating US for venous leg ulcers are small, poor-quality and heterogeneous. There is no reliable evidence that US hastens healing of venous ulcers. There is a small amount of weak evidence of increased healing with US, but this requires confirmation in larger, high-quality RCTs. There is no evidence of a benefit associated with low frequency US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.