Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20556745›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.

Christine Kettle, Therese Dowswell, Khaled Mk Ismail

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02582580 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Perineal Massage, Vaginal Dilator and Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on the Perineal Integrity Primiparous: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2015 to 2017Enrolled63ConditionsPregnancyArmsPerineal massage, Vaginal Dilator, Pelvic floor muscles training
NCT02863874 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of VicrylPlus® Versus Vicryl® for Surgical Repair of Perineal Tears; a Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,890ConditionsSkin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections, Wound InfectionArmsVicrylPlus®, Vicryl®
NCT07504991 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Combined Monopolar Radiofrequency and Ultrasound (BTL EXILIS ULTRA 360™) for the Improvement of Dyspareunia Caused by Postpartum Scarring in Women of Childbearing Age: A Study Protoco

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere VirgiliRan2026 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsDyspareuniaArmsCombining radiofrequency and ultrasound. BTL Exilis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic prophylaxis for episiotomy repair following vaginal birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Perineal care.BMJ clinical evidence · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Clinical guidance paper VVOG-CRGOLFB prevention and management of obstetrical perineal trauma.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine KettleMaternity Centre, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, City General Site, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK, ST4 6QG.
Therese Dowswell
Khaled Mk Ismail
Keele University · GBRoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 70% of women will experience perineal trauma following vaginal delivery and will require stitches. This may result in pain, suture removal and superficial dyspareunia.

objectivesTo assess the effects of different suture materials on short- and long-term morbidity following perineal repair. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing different suture materials for perineal repair after vaginal delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsWe included 18 trials with 10,171 women; comparisons included: catgut with standard synthetic (nine trials), rapidly absorbing synthetic (two trials), and glycerol impregnated catgut sutures (two trials); and standard synthetic sutures with rapidly absorbing synthetic (five trials) and monofilament sutures (one trial).Compared with catgut, standard synthetic sutures were associated with less pain up to three days after delivery (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.90); and less analgesia up to ten days postpartum (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87). More women with catgut sutures required resuturing (15/1201) compared with synthetic sutures (3/1201) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.74); while more women with standard synthetic sutures required the removal of unabsorbed suture material (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.24). Comparing standard synthetic with rapidly absorbing sutures, short- and long-term pain were similar; in one trial fewer women with rapidly absorbing sutures reported using analgesics at 10 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77). More women in the standard synthetic suture group required suture removal compared with those in the rapidly absorbed group (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.36). There was no evidence of significant differences between groups for long-term pain (three months after delivery) or for dyspareunia at three, or at six to 12 months. When catgut and glycerol impregnated catgut were compared, results were similar for most outcomes, although the latter was associated with more short-term pain. One trial examining monofilament versus standard polyglycolic sutures found no differences for most outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCatgut may increase short-term pain compared with synthetic sutures. There were few differences between standard and rapidly absorbing synthetic sutures but more women needed standard sutures removing. For other materials, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the related Cochrane review on suturing techniques.

Indexed as

SuturesAbsorbable ImplantsCatgutDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansPerineumPolyglactin 910Polyglycolic AcidPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPolyglactin 910Polyglycolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID20556745
PMCPMC7263442
OpenAlexW2114249912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.