SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Perineal Massage, Vaginal Dilator and Pelvic Floor Muscles Training on the Perineal Integrity Primiparous: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
Comparison of VicrylPlus® Versus Vicryl® for Surgical Repair of Perineal Tears; a Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial
Effectiveness of Combined Monopolar Radiofrequency and Ultrasound (BTL EXILIS ULTRA 360™) for the Improvement of Dyspareunia Caused by Postpartum Scarring in Women of Childbearing Age: A Study Protoco
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence of perineal pain and dyspareunia following spontaneous vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Antibiotic prophylaxis for episiotomy repair following vaginal birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Perineal care.BMJ clinical evidence · 2015Pooled it
- Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Postpartum perineal pain and its association with sub-classified second-degree tears and perineal trauma-A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Trial
- Randomized Trial of 3 Techniques of Perineal Skin Closure During Second-Degree Perineal Laceration Repair.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2019Trial
- Perineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): a matched-pair cluster randomized trial.BMC medicine · 2013Trial
- Article
- Clinical guidance paper VVOG-CRGOLFB prevention and management of obstetrical perineal trauma.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Persistent Postpartum Pain - A Somatic and Psychologic Perfect Storm.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Selective use of episiotomy: what is the impact on perineal trauma? Results from a retrospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2020Article
- Could Revision of the Embryology Influence Our Cesarean Delivery Technique: Towards an Optimized Cesarean Delivery for Universal Use.AJP reports · 2016Article
- The effect of vaginal closure technique on early post-operative pain following vaginal prolapse surgery: a feasibility pilot study and qualitative assessment.SpringerPlus · 2014Article
- Prevalence of episiotomy in primiparas, related conditions, and effects of episiotomy on suture materials used, perineal pain, wound healing 3 weeks postpartum, in Turkey: A prospective follow-up study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research · 2013Article
- The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial.Journal of caring sciences · 2012Article
- How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 70% of women will experience perineal trauma following vaginal delivery and will require stitches. This may result in pain, suture removal and superficial dyspareunia.
objectivesTo assess the effects of different suture materials on short- and long-term morbidity following perineal repair. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing different suture materials for perineal repair after vaginal delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsWe included 18 trials with 10,171 women; comparisons included: catgut with standard synthetic (nine trials), rapidly absorbing synthetic (two trials), and glycerol impregnated catgut sutures (two trials); and standard synthetic sutures with rapidly absorbing synthetic (five trials) and monofilament sutures (one trial).Compared with catgut, standard synthetic sutures were associated with less pain up to three days after delivery (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.90); and less analgesia up to ten days postpartum (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87). More women with catgut sutures required resuturing (15/1201) compared with synthetic sutures (3/1201) (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.74); while more women with standard synthetic sutures required the removal of unabsorbed suture material (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.24). Comparing standard synthetic with rapidly absorbing sutures, short- and long-term pain were similar; in one trial fewer women with rapidly absorbing sutures reported using analgesics at 10 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77). More women in the standard synthetic suture group required suture removal compared with those in the rapidly absorbed group (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.36). There was no evidence of significant differences between groups for long-term pain (three months after delivery) or for dyspareunia at three, or at six to 12 months. When catgut and glycerol impregnated catgut were compared, results were similar for most outcomes, although the latter was associated with more short-term pain. One trial examining monofilament versus standard polyglycolic sutures found no differences for most outcomes. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCatgut may increase short-term pain compared with synthetic sutures. There were few differences between standard and rapidly absorbing synthetic sutures but more women needed standard sutures removing. For other materials, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the related Cochrane review on suturing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.