Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20556673›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2010

Bone densitometry and vertebral fracture assessment.

E Michael Lewiecki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Corticosteroid use in chronic dermatologic disorders and osteoporosis.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021
    Review
  14. High prevalence of vertebral fractures in seizure patients with normal bone density receiving chronic anti-epileptic drugs.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  15. Optimising the management of osteoporosis.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Ex Vivo Evaluation of Hip Fracture Risk by Proximal Femur Geometry and Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Chinese Women.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of gate choice on backscatter difference measurements of cancellous bone.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

E Michael LewieckiNew Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, 300 Oak Street NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA. LEWIECKI@aol.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is used to diagnose osteoporosis, assess fracture risk, and monitor response to therapy. Of the different methods for measuring BMD, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the only technology for classifying BMD according to criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the only technology that is validated for BMD input with the WHO fracture risk assessment algorithm, FRAX. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA provides an image of the thoracic and lumbar spine for the purpose of detecting vertebral fracture deformities. Identification of a previously unrecognized vertebral fracture may change diagnostic classification, assessment of fracture risk, and treatment decisions. In comparison with standard radiographs of the spine, the correlation for detecting moderate and severe vertebral fractures is good, with a smaller dose of ionizing irradiation, greater patient convenience, and lower cost. Optimal performance of DXA and VFA requires training and adherence to quality standards.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityHumansLumbar VertebraeOsteoporosisRisk AssessmentSpinal FracturesThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.