Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20556637›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2010

A metabolomic approach to identifying chemical mediators of mammal-plant interactions.

David J Tucker, Ian Robert Wallis, Jessica M Bolton, Karen J Marsh, Adam A Rosser, Ian M Brereton, Dean Nicolle, William J Foley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metabolic differentiation of brushtail possum populations resistant and susceptible to plant toxins revealed via differential gene expression.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Koala (PeerJ · 2019
    Article
  6. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David J TuckerSchool of Science & Technology, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia.
Ian Robert Wallis
Jessica M Bolton
Karen J Marsh
Adam A Rosser
Ian M Brereton
Dean Nicolle
William J Foley
Australian National University · AUUniversity of New England · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different folivorous marsupials select their food from different subgenera of Eucalyptus, but the choices cannot be explained by known antifeedants, such as formylated phloroglucinol compounds or tannins, or by nutritional quality. Eucalypts contain a wide variety of plant secondary metabolites so it is difficult to use traditional methods to identify the chemicals that determine food selection. Therefore, we used a metabolomic approach in which we employed (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to compare chemical structures of representatives from the two subgenera and to identify chemicals that consistently differ between them. We found that dichloromethane extracts of leaves from most species in the subgenus Eucalyptus differ from those in Symphyomyrtus by the presence of free flavanones, having no substitution in Ring B. Although flavanoids are known to deter feeding by certain insects, their effects on marsupials have not been established and must be tested with controlled feeding studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsEucalyptusFeeding BehaviorFlavanonesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMarsupialiaMetabolomicsPlant LeavesPrincipal Component AnalysisFlavanones

Identifiers

PMID20556637
OpenAlexW2123971477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.