Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20556428›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2010

Cathepsins B1 and B2 in the neuropathogenic schistosome Trichobilharzia regenti: distinct gene expression profiles and presumptive roles throughout the life cycle.

Katerina Dolecková, Tomás Albrecht, Libor Mikes, Petr Horák

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Isoforms of Cathepsin B1 in Neurotropic Schistosomula ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cercarial dermatitis, a neglected allergic disease.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katerina DoleckováDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicná 7, Prague 2, Czech Republic. k.doleckova@centrum.cz
Tomás Albrecht
Libor Mikes
Petr Horák
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurotropic bird schistosome Trichobilharzia regenti possesses papain-like cysteine peptidases which have also been shown to be crucial enzymes in various developmental stages of the related human parasites Schistosoma spp. In this paper, we present data obtained by real-time polymerase chain reaction on the temporal distribution of transcripts of two cathepsins in different developmental stages of T. regenti: cathepsin B1 originally described from the gut lumen of schistosomula with presumptive role in nutrient digestion and cathepsin B2 originally found in penetration glands of cercariae with probable involvement in invasion of the final host. In spite of their mutual resemblance at the sequence level, the mRNA expression profiles clearly show distinct expression of cathepsins B1 and B2 during the development from eggs to cercariae. In the case of both cathepsins, the highest level of transcription was detected in intravertebrate stages. Putative functions of cathepsins B1 and B2 in schistosome developmental stages are discussed.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCathepsin BDucksHelminth ProteinsIsoenzymesLife Cycle StagesSchistosomatidaeSnailsCathepsin BHelminth ProteinsIsoenzymes

Identifiers

PMID20556428
OpenAlexW1969664149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.