Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20555347›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2010

Biomarkers: the useful and the not so useful--an assessment of molecular prognostic markers for cutaneous melanoma.

Bonnie E Gould Rothberg, David L Rimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is an independent predictor of survival in malignant melanoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in melanoma.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A nine-gene signature predicting clinical outcome in cutaneous melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bonnie E Gould RothbergDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
David L Rimm

Funding

Predicting Metastasis in MelanomaR01CA114277 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RIMM, DAVID L · 2006 to 2013
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R-01 CA114277NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among individuals with localized (Stage I-II) melanoma, stratifying patients by a number of phenotypic variables (e.g., depth of invasion, ulceration) yields a wide range of 10-year melanoma-specific survival rates. With the possible exception of Ki-67, no molecular assessment is routinely used. However, there have been a tremendous number of studies assessing protein expression by immunohistochemistry toward the goal of better prediction of recurrence. In a previous systematic review, which required publication of multivariable prognostic models as a strict inclusion criterion, we identified 37 manuscripts that collectively reported on 62 proteins. Data for 324 proteins extracted from 418 manuscripts did not meet our inclusion criteria for that study, but are revisited here, emphasizing trends of protein expression across either melanocytic lesion progression or gradations of tumor thickness. These identified 101 additional proteins that stratify melanoma, organized according to the Hanahan and Weinberg functional capabilities of cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansMelanomaNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20555347
PMCPMC3180927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.