Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20555305›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation2010

Impact of prophylactic versus preemptive valganciclovir on long-term renal allograft outcomes.

Michael L Spinner, Georges Saab, Ed Casabar, Lyndsey J Bowman, Gregory A Storch, Daniel C Brennan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Age matters: older age as a risk factor for CMV reactivation in the CMV serostatus-positive kidney transplant recipient.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael L SpinnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Georges Saab
Ed Casabar
Lyndsey J Bowman
Gregory A Storch
Daniel C Brennan
Washington University in St. Louis · USBarnes-Jewish Hospital · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Center for Kidney Disease ResearchP30DK079333 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMERMAN, MARC RANDALL · 2007 to 2011
$5.1M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (TL1)TL1RR024995 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$2.3M
Polyomavirus and Mentoring in Renal TransplantationK24DK002886 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRENNAN, DANIEL CONLON · 2003 to 2012
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCRR NIH HHS 1 TL1 RR024995NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR024992-01NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR024995NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK002886NIDDK NIH HHS K24-DK02886NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079333NIDDK NIH HHS P30-DK079333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth prophylactic and preemptive oral valganciclovir therapy are effective for the management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) postrenal transplantation in the short term. The long-term effect of either strategy is less well defined.

methodsWe analyzed the data on 115 adult recipients previously enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial of prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy for CMV. The primary outcome was a composite of freedom from acute rejection, graft loss, or death. Secondary outcomes included individual primary outcomes, posttransplant cardiovascular events, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, achievement of goal blood pressure, change in body mass index, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, and change in renal function. The analysis period was a minimum of 48-month posttransplant or a date of death or graft loss, whichever was earlier.

resultsThe primary outcome was similar between groups (83% prophylactic vs. 81% preemptive, P=0.754). The secondary outcomes showed similarities between the prophylactic and preemptive groups. Four patients in the prophylactic group (8%) compared with none in the preemptive group (0%) died with a functioning graft, P=0.043.

conclusionsWithin the limitations of sample size, our data suggest that either strategy for the management of CMV immediately after transplantation seems effective for patient and graft survival in the long term. CMV management is one of the many therapeutic strategies incorporated into a renal transplantation protocol, which often differs among institutions, and the decision as to which approach to use remains center- and resource-specific. The increased incidence of death in the prophylactic group requires further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAntiviral AgentsGanciclovirGraft RejectionHumansKidney TransplantationProspective StudiesReoperationTimeTreatment OutcomeValganciclovirAntiviral AgentsGanciclovirValganciclovir

Identifiers

PMID20555305
PMCPMC2924927
OpenAlexW1989674373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.