ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2010
Oral vaccine formulations stimulate mucosal and systemic antibody responses against staphylococcal enterotoxin B in a piglet model.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bacterial outer membrane vesicle-based click vaccine elicits potent immune response againstFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Article
- Determining the immunological characteristics of a novel human monoclonal antibody developed against staphylococcal enterotoxin B.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Article
- Review
- Virulence Factor Targeting of the Bacterial Pathogen Staphylococcus aureus for Vaccine and Therapeutics.Current drug targets · 2018Review
- Immunotherapy Targeting Adenosine Synthase A Decreases Severity of Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Mouse Model.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2017Article
- FDA-approved immunosuppressants targeting staphylococcal superantigens: mechanisms and insights.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2017Review
- Protective Efficacy and Mechanism of Passive Immunization with Polyclonal Antibodies in a Sepsis Model of Staphylococcus aureus Infection.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Recombinant ESAT-6-like proteins provoke protective immune responses against invasive Staphylococcus aureus disease in a murine model.Infection and immunity · 2015Article
- Fine-mapping of immunodominant linear B-cell epitopes of the Staphylococcus aureus SEB antigen using short overlapping peptides.PloS one · 2014Article
- The staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) family: SEB and siblings.Virulence · 2013Review
- Update on staphylococcal superantigen-induced signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions.Toxins · 2013Review
- Sublethal staphylococcal enterotoxin B challenge model in pigs to evaluate protection following immunization with a soybean-derived vaccine.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2013Article
- Low dose antigen exposure for a finite period in newborn rats prevents induction of mucosal tolerance.PloS one · 2012Article
- Intranasal delivery of Norwalk virus-like particles formulated in an in situ gelling, dry powder vaccine.Vaccine · 2011Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the potential for its use as an agent of biowarfare or bioterrorism, no approved vaccine against staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) exists. Nontoxic, mutant forms of SEB have been developed; however, it has been difficult to determine the efficacy of such subunit vaccine candidates due to the lack of superantigen activity of native SEB in rodents and due to the limitations of primate models. Since pigs respond to SEB in a manner similar to that of human subjects, we utilized this relevant animal model to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of a triple mutant of SEB carrying the amino acid changes L45R, Y89A, and Y94A. This recombinant mutant SEB (rmSEB) did not possess superantigen activity in pig lymphocyte cultures. Furthermore, rmSEB was unable to compete with native SEB for binding to pig leukocytes. These in vitro studies suggested that rmSEB could be a safe subunit vaccine. To test this possibility, piglets immunized orally with rmSEB formulations experienced no significant decrease in food consumption and no weight loss during the vaccination regimen. Oral vaccination with 1-mg doses of rmSEB on days 0, 7, 14, and 24 resulted in serum IgG and fecal IgA levels by day 36 that cross-reacted with native SEB. Surprisingly, the inclusion of cholera toxin adjuvant in vaccine formulations containing rmSEB did not result in increased antibody responses compared to formulations using the immunogen alone. Taken together, these studies provide additional evidence for the potential use of nontoxic forms of SEB as vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.